Re: [Asterisk-java-users] Possible bug in actionid generation?

[Chad K. <ch...@cm...>]

Stefan Reuter wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 18:05 -0500, Chad Kitching wrote:
> 
>>I converted some of asterisk-java to C#, and in the process, 
>>I may have run across a possible bug.
> 
> do you plan to release your port as open source?

Yes, I plan to.  At this point, I only have the manager API portion of 
the code working (although I've only tested the event reception and 
status action).  The fastagi code still needs work because there's no 
direct equiv to a ResourceBundle in the CLI (I don't have any need for 
FastAGI at this point, especially from C#, so it's a low priority for me).

I noticed several of the objects appear to be serializable, so was 
RMI/IIOP planned?  I believe that I will eventually need remoting in the 
C# version (the raw manager API is too chatty, and has pretty coarse 
security settings, so I don't really favor the simple proxies for this), 
so I'm wondering how far I may need to diverge from the Java version's API.

>>Either a different separator between the internal 
>>actionid and the object actionid needs to be used, or the util functions 
>>should perhaps start scanning at the second character instead of the first.
> 
> I fixed in in CVS and replaced the delimiter with a '#'.

I've done the same in my port.  Works great.