Re: [Asterisk-java-users] Suggested removal of Reply and Request builders
Brought to you by:
srt
From: Stefan R. <sr...@re...> - 2005-04-15 04:23:00
|
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 19:57 -0700, Steve Drach wrote: > As we discussed I proposed getting rid of ReplyBuilder and > RequestBuilder and folding their functionality into the AGIReply and > AGIRequest(impl) classes. Thanks for your patch. I adjusted my test cases and commited your changes to CVS HEAD. > Speaking of which, why does request have an > interface and implementation and reply doesn't? There was no appropriate reason to do so therefore I split the AGIReply into interface and implementation just like AGIRequest. =Stefan |