Re: [Asterisk-java-devel] ARI support in asterisk 2.0

[Sebastian <sc...@gm...>]

This is how I would do based on your thoughts:


release 1.0 as it is (is been long time there waiting)

I’ve merged some forks to mine to start testing at least the ones that are more active towards Ast 13 but my plan is start testing for real
about end of May, I was planing to start based on that but could change if we contact other developers with forks and merge all on the base project.


Maybe we can make like 1.1 branch with pulls from others is there are any real fixes that are for all.

if not I would move to a 2.0 version moving towards Ast 13 and ARI,

ARI is supposed to be more performant than AMI and have a easier API based on REST, is suppose to be able to do more than AMI (the example they are always giving is that you could build your queue system or voicemail system using ARI and in this way make it more light weight), anyhow I still not that convinced on what can you really do that cannot do with AGI but they are going that way.

 We can also talk with someone from projects like https://github.com/l3nz/ari4java <https://github.com/l3nz/ari4java> to check if we can merge all in one project. (we already have AMI and AGI).

 I’ve also contribute some time ago on the asterisk-java-iax but I finally desisted and i’ve just used for some click to call apps (due to be easier to go through firewalls than sip) anyway that project is defunct from my point of view due to the incapacity of find developers to move it forward.

About versions supported of asterisk I think that is possible to continue adding support to new releases adding the properties that are missing and letting the oldones too so the objects can have all of them, maybe add an identifier of the version in the object so you now how to proceed. 

I don’t know which versions are you using but I’ve been a long time in 10 and the plan is moving to 13 this year.

let me know 

best regards





> On Apr 14, 2015, at 22:22, Brett Sutton <bs...@no...> wrote:
> 
> 
> So one of the Asterisk Java dev's sebastian has suggested ARI support in 2.0
> 
> So I've never used ARI nor have I read much about it.
> 
> So there are a number of questions that come to mind.
> 
> Does ARI give asterisk java any benefits or is it just another means of 
> communicating with asterisk.
> 
> What is digiums intention with AMI vs ARI?
> 
> Is ARI designed to replace AMI or will they always exists side by side.
> 
> Are there any performance losses/gains with ARI compared with AMI.
> 
> Can ARI do stuff that AMI can't.
> 
> Other thoughts?
> 
> 
> brett
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-java-devel mailing list
> Ast...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/asterisk-java-devel