Re: [Asterisk-java-devel] ChannelFactory for Live

[daniel m. <dan...@go...>]

Hi

> as some methods may need to be moved from the AsteriskChannelImpl class to
> the AsteriskChannel interface.

from the docu:

 * channels). <p/> AsteriskServer is still in an early state of development. So,
 * when using AsteriskServer be aware that it might change in the future.

I did not discover the live packet yet, but I do not see the point in
defining interfaces but coding against concrete classes. The interface
is only useless overhead that does not give any advantage (like loose
coupling), so in my personal opinion the refactoring seems to be a
good idea.

Why do you think it would be bad design to open the
AsteriskChannelImpl to public? It provides a lot of functionality that
I probably do not want to recode in custom channels, so allowing to
inherit from the class would make things easier.

Daniel