Re: [Asterisk-java-devel] 0009924: Responses to Manager Commands Should Be Called 'Responses' and n
Brought to you by:
srt
From: Stefan R. <ste...@re...> - 2008-04-01 19:11:35
|
Martin Smith wrote: > I'm not sure how I feel about that, other than it would have been a good > semantic change. What do people think? I am not sure about my feelings on this issue. On the one hand you are right, that the current state of AMI is not optimal, on the other hand we know how to deal with it and the code is in place. A major change in the inner workings of AMI could make it hard to keep Asterisk-Java to work seamlessly with different versions of Asterisk. My favorite would be to have a proposal for a formal specification that defines AMI (or a new AMI) form the ground up. =Stefan -- reuter network consulting Neusser Str. 110 50760 Koeln Germany Telefon: +49 221 1305699-0 Telefax: +49 221 1305699-90 E-Mail: ste...@re... Jabber: ste...@re... WWW: http://www.reucon.com Steuernummern 215/5140/1791 USt-IdNr. DE220701760 |