hi all,
using the ASTAP stack->inspector process I was able to measure the tilt of the sensor of my camera.
The results in focuser steps were then converted to microns (see attachment).
Are these numbers showing a tilt that needs to be corrected? or, in other words, when the tilt is 'bad'?
I understood from another software that when tilt equals CFZ it needs to be corrected. Does this rule make sense?
The looks like a tilt which requires a correction. Microns or focus steps need some scaling to HFD. What does ASTAP show when you load a focused image and hit F5 (or F4 directly) for the image inspection. Any difference between the corners of more the 10% requires adjustment/correction. 5% or less would be good.
Regards, Han
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Expressing the nine values is delta HFD is probably the best solution. From the focusing curve a HFD/step factor can be determinated. I will look into that.
Han
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
hi Han,
thanks for looking into that. I agree that the best focus plane is a better solution for tilt measurement.
Anyway, I took a short exposure (1s) at best focus* and used the Tilt (F4) tool on ASTAP.
The reported tilt is 8%, see attachment. The direction is consistent with the delta HFD method.
Regards,
Ferrante
Ekos measures focus on multiple stars over the FOV so this 'best' focus is an average over the sensor.
That is indicating there is something to gain by adjusting the tilt.
For the ASTAP tab inspector, the idea is to copy the HFD's value of the ASTAP table into a spreadsheet. That will indicate the tilt or curvature in an other way as show in this image from cloudynights:
hi Han,
plotting HFD values makes clear the tilt and its direction and confirms the what the curve fitting shows.
I only moved the focuser by 1000 steps that should translate to 1mm. I will increase the travel on a next test.
But as the delta HFD between center and outer ring should be constant, it seems it's only 0.5 HFD.
(left chart).
The aberration is small.
hi all,
using the ASTAP stack->inspector process I was able to measure the tilt of the sensor of my camera.
The results in focuser steps were then converted to microns (see attachment).
Are these numbers showing a tilt that needs to be corrected? or, in other words, when the tilt is 'bad'?
I understood from another software that when tilt equals CFZ it needs to be corrected. Does this rule make sense?
Thanks
Ferrante
Hello Ferrante,
The looks like a tilt which requires a correction. Microns or focus steps need some scaling to HFD. What does ASTAP show when you load a focused image and hit F5 (or F4 directly) for the image inspection. Any difference between the corners of more the 10% requires adjustment/correction. 5% or less would be good.
Regards, Han
Expressing the nine values is delta HFD is probably the best solution. From the focusing curve a HFD/step factor can be determinated. I will look into that.
Han
hi Han,
thanks for looking into that. I agree that the best focus plane is a better solution for tilt measurement.
Anyway, I took a short exposure (1s) at best focus* and used the Tilt (F4) tool on ASTAP.
The reported tilt is 8%, see attachment. The direction is consistent with the delta HFD method.
Regards,
Ferrante
That is indicating there is something to gain by adjusting the tilt.
For the ASTAP tab inspector, the idea is to copy the HFD's value of the ASTAP table into a spreadsheet. That will indicate the tilt or curvature in an other way as show in this image from cloudynights:
https://www.cloudynights.com/uploads/monthly_02_2022/post-241090-0-15056100-1646001078_thumb.png
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/809050-tilt-discussion-astap/page-13#entry11741905
Any horizontal shift will indicate a tilt. Any vertical shift of the curves will indicate aberration.
As indicated here:
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/809050-tilt-discussion-astap/page-18#entry11765253
C indicates tilt/curvature, E-B indicatates aberration.
Regards, Han
hi Han,
plotting HFD values makes clear the tilt and its direction and confirms the what the curve fitting shows.
I only moved the focuser by 1000 steps that should translate to 1mm. I will increase the travel on a next test.
But as the delta HFD between center and outer ring should be constant, it seems it's only 0.5 HFD.
(left chart).
The aberration is small.
Thanks
Ferrante
Yes it is all minor. You system is good to go imaging :)
Han
thanks Han. I will try to tweak these minor issues. I saw that astap has also a live monitoring session that will guide me through the process.