the CLI version of astap does not solve any image whereas some of them are easily solved using the full version.
This happens both with linux and with windows.
In both environments I have astap vers. 2024.01.12 and astap_cli vers. 2024-01-04
Many thanks for any clue
Luca
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Normally they should perform identical. The difference could be that the GUI version remembers the last FOV and other settings if not specified in the command line.
No problem to investigate. Can you share an example image where astap_cli fails and astap.exe succeeds?
Han
Last edit: han.k 2024-01-23
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Here follows the output of the two commands when solving the attached image (to be unzipped)
Many thanks for your reply
$ astap -f TestIm1.fit [WARNING] GetPosition called without handle for PairSplitter1(TPairSplitter)
Using star database D80
Creating grayscale x 2 binning image for solving or star alignment.
111 stars, 78 quads selected in the image. 111 database stars, 78 database quads required for the square search field of 0.3°. Search window at 113% based on the number of quads. Step size at 100% of image height.
4 of 4 quads selected matching within 0.007 tolerance. Solution["] x:=-0.005027x+ 0.383760y+ -577.091993, y:=0.383735x+ 0.004985y+ -581.376595
Solution found: 14: 03 11.6 +54° 21 11 Solved in 0.1 sec. Δ was 12.5". Mount Δα=1.3", Δδ=-12.2". Used stars down to magnitude: 18.9
$ ./astap_cli -d astap_db -f TestIm1.fit
Using star database D80
Creating grayscale x 2 binning image for solving/star alignment.
ASTAP solver version CLI-2024.01.04
Search radius: 180 degrees,
Start position: 14: 03 11.8, +54d 20 59
Image height: 0.33 degrees
Binning: 2x2
Image dimensions: 3056x3056
Quad tolerance: 0.007
Minimum star size: 1.5"
Speed: normal
154 stars, 116 quads selected in the image. 154 database stars, 116 database quads required for the square search field of 0.3d. Search window at 100% based on the number of quads. Step size at 100% of image height
0d,1d,1d,2d,2d,3d,3d,4d,4d,5d,5d,6d,6d,7d,7d,8d,8d,9d,9d,10d,10d,11d,11d,12d,12d,13d,13d,14d,14d,15d,16d,16d,17d,17d,18d,18d,19d,20d,20d,21d,21d,22d,22d,23d,24d,24d,25d,26d,26d,27d,28d,28d,29d,29d,30d,31d,31d,32d,33d,34d,34d,35d,36d,36d,37d,38d,38d,39d,39d,40d,40d,41d,41d,41d,42d,42d,43d,43d,43d,44d,44d,45d,45d,45d,46d,46d,47d,47d,48d,48d,48d,49d,49d,50d,50d,50d,51d,51d,52d,52d,53d,53d,53d,54d,54d,55d,55d,56d,56d,56d,57d,57d,58d,58d,59d,59d,59d,60d,60d,61d,61d,62d,62d,62d,63d,63d,64d,64d,65d,65d,65d,66d,66d,67d,67d,68d,68d,69d,69d,69d,70d,70d,71d,71d,72d,72d,73d,73d,74d,74d,74d,75d,75d,76d,76d,77d,77d,78d,78d,79d,79d,80d,80d,80d,81d,81d,82d,82d,83d,83d,84d,84d,85d,85d,86d,86d,87d,87d,88d,88d,89d,89d,90d,90d,91d,91d,92d,92d,93d,93d,94d,94d,95d,95d,96d,97d,97d,98d,98d,99d,99d,100d,100d,101d,101d,102d,103d,103d,104d,104d,105d,105d,106d,106d,107d,108d,108d,109d,109d,110d,111d,111d,111d,112d,112d,113d,113d,113d,114d,114d,115d,115d,116d,116d,116d,117d,117d,118d,118d,119d,119d,120d,120d,120d,121d,121d,122d,122d,123d,123d,124d,124d,125d,125d,126d,126d,127d,128d,128d,129d,129d,130d,130d,131d,131d,132d,133d,133d,134d,134d,135d,136d,136d,137d,137d,138d,138d,139d,140d,140d,141d,141d,142d,142d,142d,143d,143d,144d,144d,144d,145d,145d,145d,146d,146d,146d,147d,147d,147d,148d,148d,148d,149d,149d,149d,150d,150d,150d,151d,151d,151d,152d,152d,153d,153d,153d,154d,154d,154d,155d,155d,155d,156d,156d,156d,157d,157d,157d,158d,158d,158d,159d,159d,159d,160d,160d,161d,161d,161d,162d,162d,162d,163d,163d,163d,164d,164d,164d,165d,165d,165d,166d,166d,166d,167d,167d,167d,168d,168d,169d,169d,169d,170d,170d,170d,171d,171d,171d,172d,172d,173d,173d,173d,174d,174d,174d,175d,175d,176d,176d,176d,177d,177d,177d,178d,178d,179d,179d,179d,180d,No solution found! :(
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I can see the same here. I will look why it differs. The strange thing it solves with the g05 database. The atap.exe version find 4 quads so solving is on the edge of solving/not solving.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I found the problem. Is was caused by change in September where I changed row and columns in the arrays. Astap_cli and astap.exe should now perform identical. Download a new executable from here:
the CLI version of astap does not solve any image whereas some of them are easily solved using the full version.
This happens both with linux and with windows.
In both environments I have astap vers. 2024.01.12 and astap_cli vers. 2024-01-04
Many thanks for any clue
Luca
Normally they should perform identical. The difference could be that the GUI version remembers the last FOV and other settings if not specified in the command line.
No problem to investigate. Can you share an example image where astap_cli fails and astap.exe succeeds?
Han
Last edit: han.k 2024-01-23
Here follows the output of the two commands when solving the attached image (to be unzipped)
Many thanks for your reply
$ astap -f TestIm1.fit
[WARNING] GetPosition called without handle for PairSplitter1(TPairSplitter)
Using star database D80
Creating grayscale x 2 binning image for solving or star alignment.
111 stars, 78 quads selected in the image. 111 database stars, 78 database quads required for the square search field of 0.3°. Search window at 113% based on the number of quads. Step size at 100% of image height.
4 of 4 quads selected matching within 0.007 tolerance. Solution["] x:=-0.005027x+ 0.383760y+ -577.091993, y:=0.383735x+ 0.004985y+ -581.376595
Solution found: 14: 03 11.6 +54° 21 11 Solved in 0.1 sec. Δ was 12.5". Mount Δα=1.3", Δδ=-12.2". Used stars down to magnitude: 18.9
$ ./astap_cli -d astap_db -f TestIm1.fit
Using star database D80
Creating grayscale x 2 binning image for solving/star alignment.
ASTAP solver version CLI-2024.01.04
Search radius: 180 degrees,
Start position: 14: 03 11.8, +54d 20 59
Image height: 0.33 degrees
Binning: 2x2
Image dimensions: 3056x3056
Quad tolerance: 0.007
Minimum star size: 1.5"
Speed: normal
154 stars, 116 quads selected in the image. 154 database stars, 116 database quads required for the square search field of 0.3d. Search window at 100% based on the number of quads. Step size at 100% of image height
0d,1d,1d,2d,2d,3d,3d,4d,4d,5d,5d,6d,6d,7d,7d,8d,8d,9d,9d,10d,10d,11d,11d,12d,12d,13d,13d,14d,14d,15d,16d,16d,17d,17d,18d,18d,19d,20d,20d,21d,21d,22d,22d,23d,24d,24d,25d,26d,26d,27d,28d,28d,29d,29d,30d,31d,31d,32d,33d,34d,34d,35d,36d,36d,37d,38d,38d,39d,39d,40d,40d,41d,41d,41d,42d,42d,43d,43d,43d,44d,44d,45d,45d,45d,46d,46d,47d,47d,48d,48d,48d,49d,49d,50d,50d,50d,51d,51d,52d,52d,53d,53d,53d,54d,54d,55d,55d,56d,56d,56d,57d,57d,58d,58d,59d,59d,59d,60d,60d,61d,61d,62d,62d,62d,63d,63d,64d,64d,65d,65d,65d,66d,66d,67d,67d,68d,68d,69d,69d,69d,70d,70d,71d,71d,72d,72d,73d,73d,74d,74d,74d,75d,75d,76d,76d,77d,77d,78d,78d,79d,79d,80d,80d,80d,81d,81d,82d,82d,83d,83d,84d,84d,85d,85d,86d,86d,87d,87d,88d,88d,89d,89d,90d,90d,91d,91d,92d,92d,93d,93d,94d,94d,95d,95d,96d,97d,97d,98d,98d,99d,99d,100d,100d,101d,101d,102d,103d,103d,104d,104d,105d,105d,106d,106d,107d,108d,108d,109d,109d,110d,111d,111d,111d,112d,112d,113d,113d,113d,114d,114d,115d,115d,116d,116d,116d,117d,117d,118d,118d,119d,119d,120d,120d,120d,121d,121d,122d,122d,123d,123d,124d,124d,125d,125d,126d,126d,127d,128d,128d,129d,129d,130d,130d,131d,131d,132d,133d,133d,134d,134d,135d,136d,136d,137d,137d,138d,138d,139d,140d,140d,141d,141d,142d,142d,142d,143d,143d,144d,144d,144d,145d,145d,145d,146d,146d,146d,147d,147d,147d,148d,148d,148d,149d,149d,149d,150d,150d,150d,151d,151d,151d,152d,152d,153d,153d,153d,154d,154d,154d,155d,155d,155d,156d,156d,156d,157d,157d,157d,158d,158d,158d,159d,159d,159d,160d,160d,161d,161d,161d,162d,162d,162d,163d,163d,163d,164d,164d,164d,165d,165d,165d,166d,166d,166d,167d,167d,167d,168d,168d,169d,169d,169d,170d,170d,170d,171d,171d,171d,172d,172d,173d,173d,173d,174d,174d,174d,175d,175d,176d,176d,176d,177d,177d,177d,178d,178d,179d,179d,179d,180d,No solution found! :(
I can see the same here. I will look why it differs. The strange thing it solves with the g05 database. The atap.exe version find 4 quads so solving is on the edge of solving/not solving.
I found the problem. Is was caused by change in September where I changed row and columns in the arrays. Astap_cli and astap.exe should now perform identical. Download a new executable from here:
Windows:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/astap-program/files/windows_installer/astap_command-line_version_win64.zip/download
Linux version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/astap-program/files/linux_installer/astap_command-line_version_Linux_amd64.zip/download
Han
Many thanks. Now both CLI versions work ok.
Cheers,
Luca