Menu

Live stack looping on first file ?

2022-10-09
2022-10-22
  • geert declercq

    geert declercq - 2022-10-09

    Hello,
    first of all thanks for all the effort you're putting into ASTAP!
    I'm running ASTAP on a MacBook M1.

    • Created a master dark from 30 exposures, dark list only contains a reference to the master dark file
    • Created a master flat from 30 exposures, flat list only contains a reference to the master flat file
    • Start live stack on empty folder
    • Put one raw file (cr2) into the folder
      Result:
    20:24:11  Loading master dark file /Volumes/Samsung_T5/astrophotography/2022-10-08/M31/test_astap/dark/master_dark_30x30s_at_29C_2022-10-08.fit
    20:24:11        Warning above dark sensor temperature (29) is different then the light sensor temperature (9)!       
    20:24:11  Loading master flat file /Volumes/Samsung_T5/astrophotography/2022-10-08/M31/test_astap/flat/master_flat_corrected_with_flat_darks__30xF_0xFD_2022-10-08.fit
    20:24:11        Warning: Flat not calibrated with a flat-dark/bias (keywords CALSTAT or BIAS_CNT).      
    20:24:11  Applying normalise filter on master (OSC) flat.
    20:24:11  Normalise raw OSC image by applying check pattern filter.
    20:24:12  Adding file: 1 "/Volumes/Samsung_T5/astrophotography/2022-10-08/M31/test_astap/light/M31_0001.fits"  to average. Using 30 darks, 30 flats, 0 flat-darks
    20:24:13  Creating grayscale x 2 binning image for solving/star alignment.
    20:24:14  Reference image is: /Volumes/Samsung_T5/astrophotography/2022-10-08/M31/test_astap/light/M31_0001.fits
    20:24:14  Using first reference image to determine colour adjustment factors.
    20:24:21  Adding file: 2 "/Volumes/Samsung_T5/astrophotography/2022-10-08/M31/test_astap/light/M31_0001.fits"  to average. Using 30 darks, 30 flats, 0 flat-darks
    20:24:22  Creating grayscale x 2 binning image for solving/star alignment.
    20:24:23  390 of 390 quads selected matching within 0.007 tolerance.  Solution x:=1.000000*x+ 0.000000*y+ -0.000000,  y:=-0.000000*x+ 1.000000*y+ -0.000000
    20:24:28  Adding file: 3 "/Volumes/Samsung_T5/astrophotography/2022-10-08/M31/test_astap/light/M31_0001.fits"  to average. Using 30 darks, 30 flats, 0 flat-darks
    20:24:29  Creating grayscale x 2 binning image for solving/star alignment.
    20:24:30  390 of 390 quads selected matching within 0.007 tolerance.  Solution x:=1.000000*x+ 0.000000*y+ -0.000000,  y:=-0.000000*x+ 1.000000*y+ -0.000000
    20:24:35  Adding file: 4 "/Volumes/Samsung_T5/astrophotography/2022-10-08/M31/test_astap/light/M31_0001.fits"  to average. Using 30 darks, 30 flats, 0 flat-darks
    20:24:36  Creating grayscale x 2 binning image for solving/star alignment.
    20:24:37  390 of 390 quads selected matching within 0.007 tolerance.  Solution x:=1.000000*x+ 0.000000*y+ -0.000000,  y:=-0.000000*x+ 1.000000*y+ -0.000000
    20:24:42  Adding file: 5 "/Volumes/Samsung_T5/astrophotography/2022-10-08/M31/test_astap/light/M31_0001.fits"  to average. Using 30 darks, 30 flats, 0 flat-darks
    

    It looks to me that it's constantly processing the first file, also it reports that it's using 30 darks and 30 flats; am I doing something wrong or am I misunderstanding something?

    Thanks for clarifying!

    g.

     

    Last edit: geert declercq 2022-10-09
  • han.k

    han.k - 2022-10-10

    Yes something weird is happening, restacking a single file. I have to check that after mid october when I'm back home. The live stack routine was modified some time ago where new file detecting is noe based on file date and not on renaming. converting cr2 to fits could the cause.

    reporting 30 dark, flata is normal. This because they are master dark/flats representing these amounts.

    Note that flat-dark/bias are missing. You have to recreate the master flat again from original files.there is no master bias. it is included in the master flat.

    Han

     
  • han.k

    han.k - 2022-10-10

    For the moment you probably avoid it by jpeg or tiff files if you can set that in the camera. But results will be poor compared with raw.

    Han

     
  • geert declercq

    geert declercq - 2022-10-10

    Hello Han,

    thanks for clarifying; there's no hurry, take your time to fix it.

    g.

     
  • han.k

    han.k - 2022-10-17

    This is now fixed in the code. Reason was that files names internally get a .fits extension if loaded from .cr2. I will upload a Mac version today or tomorrow.

    Han

     
  • han.k

    han.k - 2022-10-20

    New version is uploaded.

     
  • han.k

    han.k - 2022-10-22

    In version 2022-10-22 it will automatically detect if it is a raw colour image or a monochrome image.

    Han

     

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.