RE: [Assp-user] your comments please on web configuration page

[Rainer <ass...@ra...>]

Hi John,

sorry if I repeat things others have said - I haven't read their mails as it was simply too much - 50 ASSP mails
yesterday. Please skip these comments of mine ;-)

looks proposing at the first hand!
Overall-proposal(s):
- make popup-windows with/for extended explanations/examples to unclutter interface
- use human readable names on interface i.e. Max whitelist days instead of MaxWhitelistDays

Additions/corrections:

acceptAllMail: an example is missing, only 127.0.0.1 makes sense, /or/ 127.0.0.1|10.|169.254.|172.16.|192.168. (all
private nets)

spamLovers: example missing

TestMode: explanation is wrong. TestMode true means normal handling but no mail is rejected, doesn't it?

SpamSubject: example should follow common usage: [SPAM] instead of *SPAM*, preset the proposal ([SPAM] instead of SPAM)
		CheckBox "Modify Header" is missing

totalizeSpamStats is misleading as name for a feature to send your own stats to the internet.
	maybe "send my stats to ASSP website" would be better


BadAttach is missing as setting in web interface



HTH, Rainer






> -----Original Message-----
> From: ass...@li...
> [mailto:ass...@li...]On Behalf Of John Hanna
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 11:43 PM
> To: ass...@li...
> Subject: [Assp-user] your comments please on web configuration page
>
>
> Hi all. I still have a ton of testing / doublechecking to do, but I have a
> sample page for the ASSP web configuration interface to get your feedback
> on. Look at http://assp.sourceforge.net/demo.htm and let me know what you
> think. (You might notice a few new features tucked in there...) Specifically
> I'm looking for feedback on these areas:
>
> 1) default values -- are these the best "out of the box" values for novice
> users to get started with?
> 2) explanation text -- are the explanations clear, concise, helpful? How
> would you rephrase them?
> 3) spelling / grammer errors -- anybody notice anything I oopsed on?
> 4) organization -- is there something I should do to regroup or better
> organize the options?
>  -- I thought about a "tabbed" interface, but decided just having everything
> right there in front of me might be better. Is it too overwhelming?
> 5) anything else that will likely reduce / eliminate support requests? (What
> happened to that read-documentation-out-loud-to-user button anyway...)
>
> I have yet to add a section at the bottom for updating/verifying the
> whitelist, but it'll be there.
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> john
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
> relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Ass...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>