|
From: Thomas E. <Tho...@th...> - 2012-05-20 07:36:34
|
>Shouldn't ASSP do the virus check before the spam check May-18-12 07:52:28 May-18-12 07:52:38 It has taken 10 seconds to do the virus check, It is not possible to do this check (before spam checks) on every mail on high load systems. May-18-12 07:52:28 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... [scoring] SPF: fail ip=37.45.95.183 mai...@bm... helo=[37.45.95.183] May-18-12 07:52:28 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... Message-Score: added 10 (spfValencePB) for SPF fail, total score for this message is now 15 There is no good reason to do any further check if SPF failes! Increase the score or set SPF to block. >I found one message which is stored in ./spam. ASSP was unable to remove the file in ./spam for any reason. Normaly assp will remove the stored file and will recreate a new one - in you case the new one would be NULL. Thomas Von: Marcus Bergmann <ber...@te...> An: "ass...@li..." <ass...@li...>, Datum: 19.05.2012 18:07 Betreff: [Assp-user] Spam lover mail is stored even it contains virus Hi All, I'm using ASSP 2.1.1(12090). I have configured SpamVirusLog:=0. Inside the maillog.txt I found one message which is stored in ./spam. Here is the log: May-18-12 07:52:27 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> Message-Score: added 5 (fiphValencePB) for Suspicious HELO - contains IP: '[37.45.95.183]', total score for this message is now 5 May-18-12 07:52:27 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> [scoring] (Suspicious HELO - contains IP: '[37.45.95.183]') May-18-12 07:52:28 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... [scoring] SPF: fail ip=37.45.95.183 mai...@bm... helo=[37.45.95.183] May-18-12 07:52:28 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... Message-Score: added 10 (spfValencePB) for SPF fail, total score for this message is now 15 May-18-12 07:52:28 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] [DNSBL] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... [scoring] DNSBL: neutral, 37.45.95.183 listed in zen.spamhaus.org May-18-12 07:52:28 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... Message-Score: added 25 for DNSBL: neutral, 37.45.95.183 listed in zen.spamhaus.org, total score for this message is now 40 May-18-12 07:52:28 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] [PTRmissing] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... [scoring] (PTR missing) May-18-12 07:52:28 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... Message-Score: added 10 (ptmValencePB) for PTR missing, total score for this message is now 50 May-18-12 07:52:28 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] [MessageLimit][sl] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... [spam found] and possibly passing because spamlover for this check, otherwise blocked (MessageScore 50, limit 50) [FW Check the attachment you have to react somehow to this picture] -> /opt/assp/spam/FW_Check_the_attachment_you_have_to_react_somehow_--140588.eml May-18-12 07:52:38 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... ClamAV: scanned 60690 bytes in message - FOUND Email.Trojan-324(0c917161a5c9f158203112f7bce8b94c:60690) May-18-12 07:52:38 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... Message-Score: added 50 (vdValencePB) for virus detected: 'Email.Trojan-324(0c917161a5c9f158203112f7bce8b94c:60690)', total score for this message is now 100 May-18-12 07:52:38 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] [VIRUS] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... [spam found] (virus detected: 'Email.Trojan-324(0c917161a5c9f158203112f7bce8b94c:60690)') [FW Check the attachment you have to react somehow to this picture] -> /opt/assp/spam/FW_Check_the_attachment_you_have_to_react_somehow_--140588.eml; May-18-12 07:52:38 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... [SMTP Error] 554 5.7.1 Mail appears infected with \[Email.Trojan-324(0c917161a5c9f158203112f7bce8b94c:60690)\]. May-18-12 07:52:38 m1-20347-11296 [Worker_2] 37.45.95.183 <fli...@bm...> to: us...@do... [SMTP Status] 451 4.7.1 Greylisted - Please try again later After the message gets some penalty points because of HELO, SPF, DNSBL and PTR the MessageScore limit of 50 is reached and the message is stored in ./spam folder. Then ASSP detects via ClamAV that the message contains a virus and rejects it. Shouldn't ASSP do the virus check before the spam check, reject and don't store the message? We want to use the following policy: faked local sender or unknown local receiver or message contains virus -> reject them all, don't store; all other spam -> reject (e.g. DNSBL) or tag (e.g. Baysian), store in ./spam for resed via reports. Thank you, Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Ass...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user DISCLAIMER: ******************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email! ******************************************************* |