Re: [Assp-user] Re placing the bayesian engine with DSPAM?

[Jeroen v. A. <kr...@at...>]

bytehd wrote:
> This is dumb design.
> Fritz and John have it right: 
> do the easy, simple-to-execute (helo checks come to mind) checking
> then, after all the OBVIOUS things are done, run Bayes.

I agree it seems the right thing to do. But I can imagine the filtering 
happening before the bayesian filter may become less and less effective. 
   If spammers actually got wiser and decided to have their software 
obey common standards. Many of those filters do seem to depend on 
spammers' software to be broken. Or did I miss something?

Regards,
Jeroen