[Assorted-commits] SF.net SVN: assorted: [517] numa-bench/trunk/doc/analysis.txt

[<yan...@us...>]

Revision: 517
          http://assorted.svn.sourceforge.net/assorted/?rev=517&view=rev
Author:   yangzhang
Date:     2008-02-26 12:49:46 -0800 (Tue, 26 Feb 2008)

Log Message:
-----------
fixed links

Modified Paths:
--------------
    numa-bench/trunk/doc/analysis.txt

Modified: numa-bench/trunk/doc/analysis.txt
===================================================================
--- numa-bench/trunk/doc/analysis.txt	2008-02-26 20:48:46 UTC (rev 516)
+++ numa-bench/trunk/doc/analysis.txt	2008-02-26 20:49:46 UTC (rev 517)
@@ -32,9 +32,9 @@
 - Read vs. write
   - Substantial difference. Random writes are ~2x slower than random reads.
   - Compare
-    [a](graphs/ncores-16-size-1000000000-nreps-1-shuffle-0-par-0-pin-1-local-0-write-0-cross-0.pdf)
+    [a](graphs/ncores-16-size-100000000-nreps-1-shuffle-1-par-0-pin-1-local-0-write-0-cross-0.pdf)
     and
-    [b](graphs/ncores-16-size-1000000000-nreps-1-shuffle-0-par-0-pin-1-local-0-write-1-cross-0.pdf)
+    [b](graphs/ncores-16-size-100000000-nreps-1-shuffle-1-par-0-pin-1-local-0-write-1-cross-0.pdf)
 - Does `malloc` tend to allocate locally?
   - Yes, because working with memory allocated from the current thread shows
     improved times.


This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.