I've been able to compile from CVS in Redhat 8, 9 and RH Enterprise v2
The only problem I had was running cvsprep. Only on the machine running RH8
I was able to prepare sources for instalation (read documentation on
autoconf version requirements), the resulting set then compiled flawlessly
under all red hat flavors. I'm not getting seg faults and it's pretty
stable. I also linked the fcgi libraries for sc.c => the s.cgi binary so it
works much much faster now.
Rand, what happens when you try to compile under OS X? what errors do you
get? Try compiling from the current CVS and use an older autoconf when
running cvsprep (2.53 worked for me) 2.57 failed but instructions clearly
state to use 2.50.
I then compiled (removed the -g flags) and installed with install-strip
----- Original Message -----
From: "rand" <osx...@gm...>
To: <ase...@li...>
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: [aseek-users] CVS, Compilation, FastCGI and ASPSeek
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jesus Altuve <jes...@ho...>
> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:52:48 -0400
> Subject: [aseek-users] CVS, Compilation, FastCGI and ASPSeek
> To: ase...@li...
>
>
> Hi List,
>
> I've succesfully linked, tested and compiled (in a production
> environment) the s.cgi binary with FastCGI support, including some
> small modifications to correct problems when printing return headers
> in a persisten environment. What is the official way to submit user
> contributed modifications?.
>
> Is ASPSeek still been actively developed? I want to sell a search
> appliance using ASPSeek, Who would be the person to discuss ASPSeek
> commercial licensing?
>
> Thanks
>
> Yay, activity!
> I've been trying to get ASPSeek running in osx, but I doubt I will be
> able to, I to would love to know if it's still being actively
> developed
>
> rand
>
|
