aspseek-users — Users of ASPseek - ask questions, exchange ideas here

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] [install] can't connect

[je b <je...@re...>]

thanks ! that did it !

BUT : i have another error with the message "Error in query: " on the browser.

error_log says :

Error recv() Broken pipe
Error send() Broken pipe
Error send() Broken pipe

what is the solution ? thanks for anyfeedback !

------Original Message------
From: "Brett" <br...@bp...>
To: <ase...@li...>
Sent: February 4, 2001 1:26:05 PM GMT
Subject: Re: [aseek-users] [install] can't connect


make sure you set the db user and password in your searchd.conf file. More
than likely you only set it in the aspseek.conf file.

--Brett

----- Original Message -----
From: "je b" <je...@re...>
To: <ase...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 4:43 AM
Subject: [aseek-users] [install] can't connect


> Hi Aspseek users,
>
> this is a newbie installation question, so don't blame me...
>
> everything on install went fine :
>
> configure, make , make install, index + searchd
>
> But when I tried to make a search, it returns "An Error Occured!"
>
> the error_log says "can't connect"
>
> this is weird, because with 'index', the mysql connection went fine and
the tables got filled up with the data ...
>
> any idea ?
>
> thanks for any feedback, jeb
>
> ______________________________________________
> FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
> Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
>

______________________________________________
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] feature request: new template variables

[Jed M. <jm...@mi...>]

Hello all,

I have been using aspseek for about a week now (http://3sportsearch.org
approx 100,000 docs indexed)  and so far I am very happy with it.
I would really love to see a few template variables added:


in res and res2:
It would be nice to have the base url of the search result.  For example,
if the search result is: www.active.com/triathlon/, I would like to
have a variable that had www.active.com

in the bottom section (and probably others sections as well):
It would be nice to have the escaped search query.  For example, if the
query was 'interwoven teamsite' an escaped query would have
'interwoven%20teamsite'.  This would make it a lot easier to include a
"try your search on X search".  Right now, if it is a multiword query,
their will be a space in the call to the other search engine and it will
not work.

does not work:
http://www.google.com/search?q=interwoven teamsite

but this would work with an escaped query:
http://www.google.com/search?q=interwoven%20teamsite


I don't think that these are current features, but if they are, please
point me to a RTFM.

While I am on the topic of feature requests, I also have another one for
the indexer.  It would be nice to limit what will get indexed by string
instead of just regex.  (This is one of the features of htdig that I
loved.)  For example, if in the index.conf file, if I enter:

Server http://active.com/triathlon

it would only index pages that had that url string.  So it would index
http://active.com/triathlon/results.html but it would not index
http://active.com/duathlon/results.html


That is about it for now.  Thank you for your time and your great product.

-Jed

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] [install] can't connect

[Julio C. G. V. <olg...@mo...>]

Hi everybody,

I'm managing a few thousands pages with UdmSearch. It's a good engine but in
my server it's a bit slow.

I'd like to try ASPSeek since its speed is really impressive.

I haven't been able to install it because configure tells me STL libraries
are missing...

I tried to download those libraries from butler.hpl.hp.com without success.
I downloaded the SGI STL libraries and tried to install ASPSeek but
configure still continues giving me the same message: STL libraries
missing...

I tried with the option --includeDIR but again I couldn't.

I suspect SGI STL libraries I downloaded are not the right ones.

Could someone tell me from which site I can download the right STL libraries
and once installed, if I have to use the --includeDIR option in order to
make configure to look there?

Sorry for such elementary question...

Any help would be very much appreciated,



Julio C. Galaret Viera

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] [install] can't connect

[je b <je...@re...>]

Hi Aspseek users,

this is a newbie installation question, so don't blame me...

everything on install went fine :

configure, make , make install, index + searchd

But when I tried to make a search, it returns "An Error Occured!"

the error_log says "can't connect"

this is weird, because with 'index', the mysql connection went fine and the tables got filled up with the data ...

any idea ?

thanks for any feedback, jeb

______________________________________________
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] [install] can't connect

[Brett <br...@bp...>]

make sure you set the db user and password in your searchd.conf file. More
than likely you only set it in the aspseek.conf file.

--Brett

----- Original Message -----
From: "je b" <je...@re...>
To: <ase...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 4:43 AM
Subject: [aseek-users] [install] can't connect


> Hi Aspseek users,
>
> this is a newbie installation question, so don't blame me...
>
> everything on install went fine :
>
> configure, make , make install, index + searchd
>
> But when I tried to make a search, it returns "An Error Occured!"
>
> the error_log says "can't connect"
>
> this is weird, because with 'index', the mysql connection went fine and
the tables got filled up with the data ...
>
> any idea ?
>
> thanks for any feedback, jeb
>
> ______________________________________________
> FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
> Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
>

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] Feature request

[Brett <br...@bp...>]

How about an option to allow the server to index pages in a filesystem =
rather than through http? For instance there could be a config option =
that maps a URL to a directory so for instance:

http://www.mydomain.com/ =3D /home/httpd/docs/index.html

This was the results can be stored as the proper url even though all of =
the indexing took place without having to put any strain on the web =
server...

It would still function the same way by spidering the site instead of =
getting a listing of files (which might include files that the =
maintainer does not want to be seen). To build on this even further you =
can have it setup so that this works for only certain file types (like =
htm, html, txt...) and if it comes across a file type that isn't listed =
in that config option it will fall back to retrieving it using http =
instead. This would be useful in order to avoid indexing a dynamic page =
such as shtml or php which might be including other files or database =
queries.

So the positive effect that this feature would have is conserving cpu =
since the web server does not get involved (and does not log unnecessary =
stats). Also it can be flexibel enough to still retrieve dynamic pages =
via the web like normal. This would also benefit my other goal of =
getting last-modified times from dynamic pages that otherwise don't =
include this in the http header since it can now just check the file =
systems last mod time instead. Not to mention that this could be a good =
way of indexing pages or data that don't even fall under a web server.

--Brett

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

Brett wrote:
> 
> Fantastic. I might have to start browsing the CVS branch now.
> 
> Is there a way to look at a change log? Also, is there a TODO list
> somewhere? I have one other feature request and I would like to see if it is
> already in the works...

Well, we maintain a small changelog in NEWS file
(http://www.asplinux.ru/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/aspseek/NEWS?rev=1.17). There are
also individual file changelogs, like that one:
http://www.asplinux.ru/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/aspseek/src/daemon.cpp

As for the TODO list, it's here
http://www.asplinux.ru/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/aspseek/TODO?rev=1.22
All items are for 1.1-devel, and I'm planning to put the priority
marks there.

We are already developing support for other databases...it's not
placed it CVS yet, but will be available from there next week. Later
we will release 1.1.0-devel, for bravehearts only ;~)

Please ask about the other feature you need.

> 
> Everyone that has seen the demo that installed has been extremely impressed
> by the speed and features.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brett
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kir Kolyshkin" <ki...@as...>
> To: <ase...@li...>
> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 8:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times
> 
> > Oh, thank you, so I finally found what you need - knowing the last
> modified
> > date, for printing it in results, for sorting results by date, for
> limiting
> > results to given dates. Am I right?
> >
> > Hmm...this would be not a five-minutes hack to do it...we store
> Last-Modified
> > header in SQL DB and later send it back...so we can't store "date" meta
> there.
> > But we can add one extra field into SQL DB, for just storing "date" meta.
> >
> > Later, in a process of parsing delta files, ranks calculation and so
> (which
> > is done before index finishes, or explicitly by running index -D),
> > Last-Modified fields gets read from SQL DB and stored into binary file
> > named "lastmod", format of the file is described in lastmod.h (or .cpp)
> >
> > Ok, I will include it in 1.1-devel TODO, we can't do it in 1.0 because
> this
> > needs database changes.
> >
> >
> > Brett Pappas wrote:
> > >
> > > Kir,
> > > see my notes below:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Kir Kolyshkin" <ki...@as...>
> > > To: <ase...@li...>
> > > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:42 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times
> > > >
> > > > Can you provide me with more details:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Should date meta tag have a higher priority than Last-Modified, or
> > > > be taken into account only if there is no Last-Modified?
> > >
> > > I feel the best apporach would be to use it as a higher priority over
> > > Last-Modiifed since if someone took the time to inlcude it in their
> document
> > > then they must prefer it to the lastmod time. Also it could be a config
> > > option that is turned off by default...
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 2. Is that a standard of any kind, or just ht://Dig extension? If it's
> > > > not a standard, please describe a way how you use it.
> > >
> > > Yes it is an accepted standard for a few search engines out there. In
> fact
> > > htdig will either use "date" or "htdig-date" as the meta name.
> > >
> > > > 3. Does this prevents re-loading the whole document from the network,
> > > > or it just prevents from document parsing and storing in DB?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you talking about the meta tag or
> the
> > > server parsed file? The meta tag is just there for informational
> purposes
> > > similar to a meta description tag etc..
> > >
> > > The server parsing things is common to all web servers like netscape and
> > > apache in the fact that if the file is parsed on the server (like ssi's,
> > > php, etc..) then the server never gives you a proper last-modified date
> (it
> > > will usually just say unknown in netscape, I think IE will just give
> today's
> > > date).
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 4. What is date format?
> > >
> > > An example would be:
> > >
> > >  <meta name="date" content="2001-01-31">
> > >
> > > So in other words "Y-m-d" with leading zeros for the day and month
> fields.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > BTW please note that we also honour/set ETag/If-None-Match pair of
> > > headers,
> > > > and we also honour Expires: header, if it is set to a date later than
> > > > now + Period from aspseek.conf (See RFC 2616).
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't really think this relates to what I am needing to do since this
> is
> > > more about expriring content from pages where as all I am wanting to do
> is
> > > determine when the document was created/modified last.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help, I look forward to anything you can do. I wish I
> knew
> > > more C so I could help out. My feeling is that if you are already
> > > interpreting other meta tags such as description, content and robot -
> then
> > > it would be pretty straight forward to add this feature but then again I
> > > have no idea where you are storing the lastmod dates for each url so
> maybe I
> > > am wrong ;-)
> > >
> > > Thanks for any help,
> > > Brett
> > >
> > > > Maybe this will be of any help to you?
> > > >
> > > > -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ
> 7551596 --
> > > > "Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some
> > > interesting
> > > >  and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.
> > > >
> >
> > -- |< [] [] |_  ki...@as...  http://kir.sever.net  ICQ 7551596 --
> > "Maybe somebody should tell gcc maintainers about programmers
> >  that know more than the compiler again."  -- Linus Torvalds.
> >

-- |< [] [] |_  ki...@as...  http://kir.sever.net  ICQ 7551596 --
"Maybe somebody should tell gcc maintainers about programmers
 that know more than the compiler again."  -- Linus Torvalds.

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times

[Brett <br...@bp...>]

Fantastic. I might have to start browsing the CVS branch now.

Is there a way to look at a change log? Also, is there a TODO list
somewhere? I have one other feature request and I would like to see if it is
already in the works...

Everyone that has seen the demo that installed has been extremely impressed
by the speed and features.

Thanks,
Brett

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kir Kolyshkin" <ki...@as...>
To: <ase...@li...>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times


> Oh, thank you, so I finally found what you need - knowing the last
modified
> date, for printing it in results, for sorting results by date, for
limiting
> results to given dates. Am I right?
>
> Hmm...this would be not a five-minutes hack to do it...we store
Last-Modified
> header in SQL DB and later send it back...so we can't store "date" meta
there.
> But we can add one extra field into SQL DB, for just storing "date" meta.
>
> Later, in a process of parsing delta files, ranks calculation and so
(which
> is done before index finishes, or explicitly by running index -D),
> Last-Modified fields gets read from SQL DB and stored into binary file
> named "lastmod", format of the file is described in lastmod.h (or .cpp)
>
> Ok, I will include it in 1.1-devel TODO, we can't do it in 1.0 because
this
> needs database changes.
>
>
> Brett Pappas wrote:
> >
> > Kir,
> > see my notes below:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kir Kolyshkin" <ki...@as...>
> > To: <ase...@li...>
> > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:42 PM
> > Subject: Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times
> > >
> > > Can you provide me with more details:
> > >
> > > 1. Should date meta tag have a higher priority than Last-Modified, or
> > > be taken into account only if there is no Last-Modified?
> >
> > I feel the best apporach would be to use it as a higher priority over
> > Last-Modiifed since if someone took the time to inlcude it in their
document
> > then they must prefer it to the lastmod time. Also it could be a config
> > option that is turned off by default...
> >
> > >
> > > 2. Is that a standard of any kind, or just ht://Dig extension? If it's
> > > not a standard, please describe a way how you use it.
> >
> > Yes it is an accepted standard for a few search engines out there. In
fact
> > htdig will either use "date" or "htdig-date" as the meta name.
> >
> > > 3. Does this prevents re-loading the whole document from the network,
> > > or it just prevents from document parsing and storing in DB?
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you talking about the meta tag or
the
> > server parsed file? The meta tag is just there for informational
purposes
> > similar to a meta description tag etc..
> >
> > The server parsing things is common to all web servers like netscape and
> > apache in the fact that if the file is parsed on the server (like ssi's,
> > php, etc..) then the server never gives you a proper last-modified date
(it
> > will usually just say unknown in netscape, I think IE will just give
today's
> > date).
> >
> > >
> > > 4. What is date format?
> >
> > An example would be:
> >
> >  <meta name="date" content="2001-01-31">
> >
> > So in other words "Y-m-d" with leading zeros for the day and month
fields.
> >
> > >
> > > BTW please note that we also honour/set ETag/If-None-Match pair of
> > headers,
> > > and we also honour Expires: header, if it is set to a date later than
> > > now + Period from aspseek.conf (See RFC 2616).
> > >
> >
> > I don't really think this relates to what I am needing to do since this
is
> > more about expriring content from pages where as all I am wanting to do
is
> > determine when the document was created/modified last.
> >
> > Thanks for your help, I look forward to anything you can do. I wish I
knew
> > more C so I could help out. My feeling is that if you are already
> > interpreting other meta tags such as description, content and robot -
then
> > it would be pretty straight forward to add this feature but then again I
> > have no idea where you are storing the lastmod dates for each url so
maybe I
> > am wrong ;-)
> >
> > Thanks for any help,
> > Brett
> >
> > > Maybe this will be of any help to you?
> > >
> > > -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ
7551596 --
> > > "Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some
> > interesting
> > >  and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.
> > >
>
> -- |< [] [] |_  ki...@as...  http://kir.sever.net  ICQ 7551596 --
> "Maybe somebody should tell gcc maintainers about programmers
>  that know more than the compiler again."  -- Linus Torvalds.
>

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

Oh, thank you, so I finally found what you need - knowing the last modified
date, for printing it in results, for sorting results by date, for limiting
results to given dates. Am I right?

Hmm...this would be not a five-minutes hack to do it...we store Last-Modified
header in SQL DB and later send it back...so we can't store "date" meta there.
But we can add one extra field into SQL DB, for just storing "date" meta.

Later, in a process of parsing delta files, ranks calculation and so (which
is done before index finishes, or explicitly by running index -D),
Last-Modified fields gets read from SQL DB and stored into binary file
named "lastmod", format of the file is described in lastmod.h (or .cpp)

Ok, I will include it in 1.1-devel TODO, we can't do it in 1.0 because this
needs database changes.


Brett Pappas wrote:
> 
> Kir,
> see my notes below:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kir Kolyshkin" <ki...@as...>
> To: <ase...@li...>
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times
> >
> > Can you provide me with more details:
> >
> > 1. Should date meta tag have a higher priority than Last-Modified, or
> > be taken into account only if there is no Last-Modified?
> 
> I feel the best apporach would be to use it as a higher priority over
> Last-Modiifed since if someone took the time to inlcude it in their document
> then they must prefer it to the lastmod time. Also it could be a config
> option that is turned off by default...
> 
> >
> > 2. Is that a standard of any kind, or just ht://Dig extension? If it's
> > not a standard, please describe a way how you use it.
> 
> Yes it is an accepted standard for a few search engines out there. In fact
> htdig will either use "date" or "htdig-date" as the meta name.
> 
> > 3. Does this prevents re-loading the whole document from the network,
> > or it just prevents from document parsing and storing in DB?
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you talking about the meta tag or the
> server parsed file? The meta tag is just there for informational purposes
> similar to a meta description tag etc..
> 
> The server parsing things is common to all web servers like netscape and
> apache in the fact that if the file is parsed on the server (like ssi's,
> php, etc..) then the server never gives you a proper last-modified date (it
> will usually just say unknown in netscape, I think IE will just give today's
> date).
> 
> >
> > 4. What is date format?
> 
> An example would be:
> 
>  <meta name="date" content="2001-01-31">
> 
> So in other words "Y-m-d" with leading zeros for the day and month fields.
> 
> >
> > BTW please note that we also honour/set ETag/If-None-Match pair of
> headers,
> > and we also honour Expires: header, if it is set to a date later than
> > now + Period from aspseek.conf (See RFC 2616).
> >
> 
> I don't really think this relates to what I am needing to do since this is
> more about expriring content from pages where as all I am wanting to do is
> determine when the document was created/modified last.
> 
> Thanks for your help, I look forward to anything you can do. I wish I knew
> more C so I could help out. My feeling is that if you are already
> interpreting other meta tags such as description, content and robot - then
> it would be pretty straight forward to add this feature but then again I
> have no idea where you are storing the lastmod dates for each url so maybe I
> am wrong ;-)
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> Brett
> 
> > Maybe this will be of any help to you?
> >
> > -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
> > "Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some
> interesting
> >  and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.
> >

-- |< [] [] |_  ki...@as...  http://kir.sever.net  ICQ 7551596 --
"Maybe somebody should tell gcc maintainers about programmers
 that know more than the compiler again."  -- Linus Torvalds.

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times

[Brett P. <br...@bp...>]

Kir,
see my notes below:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kir Kolyshkin" <ki...@as...>
To: <ase...@li...>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times
>
> Can you provide me with more details:
>
> 1. Should date meta tag have a higher priority than Last-Modified, or
> be taken into account only if there is no Last-Modified?

I feel the best apporach would be to use it as a higher priority over
Last-Modiifed since if someone took the time to inlcude it in their document
then they must prefer it to the lastmod time. Also it could be a config
option that is turned off by default...

>
> 2. Is that a standard of any kind, or just ht://Dig extension? If it's
> not a standard, please describe a way how you use it.

Yes it is an accepted standard for a few search engines out there. In fact
htdig will either use "date" or "htdig-date" as the meta name.

> 3. Does this prevents re-loading the whole document from the network,
> or it just prevents from document parsing and storing in DB?

I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you talking about the meta tag or the
server parsed file? The meta tag is just there for informational purposes
similar to a meta description tag etc..

The server parsing things is common to all web servers like netscape and
apache in the fact that if the file is parsed on the server (like ssi's,
php, etc..) then the server never gives you a proper last-modified date (it
will usually just say unknown in netscape, I think IE will just give today's
date).

>
> 4. What is date format?

An example would be:

 <meta name="date" content="2001-01-31">

So in other words "Y-m-d" with leading zeros for the day and month fields.

>
> BTW please note that we also honour/set ETag/If-None-Match pair of
headers,
> and we also honour Expires: header, if it is set to a date later than
> now + Period from aspseek.conf (See RFC 2616).
>

I don't really think this relates to what I am needing to do since this is
more about expriring content from pages where as all I am wanting to do is
determine when the document was created/modified last.

Thanks for your help, I look forward to anything you can do. I wish I knew
more C so I could help out. My feeling is that if you are already
interpreting other meta tags such as description, content and robot - then
it would be pretty straight forward to add this feature but then again I
have no idea where you are storing the lastmod dates for each url so maybe I
am wrong ;-)

Thanks for any help,
Brett


> Maybe this will be of any help to you?
>
> -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
> "Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some
interesting
>  and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.
>

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] Date modified times

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

Brett Pappas wrote:
> 
> Does ASPSeek support the meta date tag? We are currently using htdig to
> archive 15 of our newspapers acros the country. Most of the documents are
> server parsed (shtml, php, cfm, etc..) which destroys the Last-Modified
> header that gets sent to the browser/spider. So we use the date meta tag
> which htdig will use instead of the lastmod header.
> 
> If not, how hard would it be to add it since the meta date format is pretty
> specific. I am really impressed with some of the other features of ASPSeek
> but this would be a show stopper if we have no way to get the date modified
> times for our documents.

Can you provide me with more details:

1. Should date meta tag have a higher priority than Last-Modified, or
be taken into account only if there is no Last-Modified?

2. Is that a standard of any kind, or just ht://Dig extension? If it's
not a standard, please describe a way how you use it.

3. Does this prevents re-loading the whole document from the network,
or it just prevents from document parsing and storing in DB?

4. What is date format? 

BTW please note that we also honour/set ETag/If-None-Match pair of headers,
and we also honour Expires: header, if it is set to a date later than 
now + Period from aspseek.conf (See RFC 2616).

Maybe this will be of any help to you?

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
"Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some interesting
 and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] Date modified times

[Brett P. <br...@bp...>]

Does ASPSeek support the meta date tag? We are currently using htdig to
archive 15 of our newspapers acros the country. Most of the documents are
server parsed (shtml, php, cfm, etc..) which destroys the Last-Modified
header that gets sent to the browser/spider. So we use the date meta tag
which htdig will use instead of the lastmod header.

If not, how hard would it be to add it since the meta date format is pretty
specific. I am really impressed with some of the other features of ASPSeek
but this would be a show stopper if we have no way to get the date modified
times for our documents.

Thanks,
Brett

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: 2 words in search s.cgicauses an error

[<ap...@li...>]

actually im using my own compiled gcc 2.95.2 straight from  
http://gcc.gnu.org/  instead of the vendor supplied one...

gcc -v  
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/specs  
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)                   

You may want to just make O0 the default and change instructions to try 
using O2 for better speed, but that it may not always work... 
also i strip the programs, and it reduced the size by 80% at least.

Thank you for your assistance!

                  



On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:

> ap...@li... wrote:
> > 
> > I am currently using gcc 2.95.2    its to old?????
> 
> Well, it happens that there's no one true version 2.95.2 (or any other), because
> vendors tends to provide the same versions with different patch sets applied.
> For example, in all of RedHats 6.x - 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 the gcc --version says
> 
> egcs-2.91.66
> 
> but these versions are not the same - the one from 6.2 works, others doesn't.
> And there's no general rule and recommended version though. Sorry...you have
> to find it out yourself. Maybe I'll write some tests to identify broken gcc
> versions (and include it in ASPSeek's configure), if I'll ever have free time...
> 
> > Also is it possible to build a perl interface to searchd, instead of s.cgi
> > 
> > I would like to create a mod_perl version.
> 
> Well, due to searchd existence this will not be extremely easy. I support that
> template parser will take most coding time.
> 
> -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
> "Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some interesting
>  and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.
> 

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: 2 words in search s.cgicauses an error

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

ap...@li... wrote:
> 
> I am currently using gcc 2.95.2    its to old?????

Well, it happens that there's no one true version 2.95.2 (or any other), because
vendors tends to provide the same versions with different patch sets applied.
For example, in all of RedHats 6.x - 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 the gcc --version says

egcs-2.91.66

but these versions are not the same - the one from 6.2 works, others doesn't.
And there's no general rule and recommended version though. Sorry...you have
to find it out yourself. Maybe I'll write some tests to identify broken gcc
versions (and include it in ASPSeek's configure), if I'll ever have free time...

> Also is it possible to build a perl interface to searchd, instead of s.cgi
> 
> I would like to create a mod_perl version.

Well, due to searchd existence this will not be extremely easy. I support that
template parser will take most coding time.

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
"Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some interesting
 and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: 2 words in search s.cgi causes an error

[<ap...@li...>]

I am currently using gcc 2.95.2    its to old?????

Also is it possible to build a perl interface to searchd, instead of s.cgi

I would like to create a mod_perl version.

Thanks!



On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:

> support wrote:
> > 
> > I recompiled with compiler option O0 and it works fine now.
> 
> Now, try to upgrade your compiler. searchd works faster if compiled with -O2.
> 
> And please, submit your search engine to our list, at
> http://www.sw.com.sg/products/aspseek/install
> 
> > 
> > Thank you very much!
> > 
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> > 
> > > rob wrote:
> > > > I successfully indexed 30,000 websites. with aspseek 1.0
> > > >
> > > > When i search with one word, everything works perfect.
> > > >
> > > > When i search with 2 or more words seperarted by space, an error
> > > > occurs and typically searchd -D  is gone/dies
> > >
> > > First, please don't ask ASPSeek-related questions at MnogoSearch webboard.
> > > ASPSeek and MnogoSearch are completely unrelated and even competing projects.
> > >
> > > Second, I suspect that your compiler is weird. Please try to recompile searchd
> > > without -O2 flag. To do that, run
> > >
> > > CXXFLAGS="-g -O0" ./configure --your-options
> > > make clean
> > > cd src
> > > make searchd
> > >
> > > then manually install searchd to /usr/local/aspseek/sbin/ (or there you have it)
> > > and restart (killall -TERM searchd; sleep 5; ./searchd -D)
> > >
> > > Try your search again. If it is ok and searchd is stable now, blame your compiler,
> > > or, better, upgrade it. It it is not, please take sure that your running searchd
> > > is really compiled without -O2, and then blame us. No! Don't blame, just send a
> > > bug report to ase...@li..., and tell all the details.
> > >
> > > BTW to subscribe to aseek-users, please send "subsribe aseek-users" in the
> > > body of the message to maj...@li.... This list is a definitive
> > > place for ASPSeek users' problems.
> > >
> > > -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
> > > "Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some interesting
> > >  and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.
> > >
> 
> -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
> "Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some interesting
>  and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.
> 

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: 2 words in search s.cgi causes an error

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

support wrote:
> 
> I recompiled with compiler option O0 and it works fine now.

Now, try to upgrade your compiler. searchd works faster if compiled with -O2.

And please, submit your search engine to our list, at
http://www.sw.com.sg/products/aspseek/install

> 
> Thank you very much!
> 
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> 
> > rob wrote:
> > > I successfully indexed 30,000 websites. with aspseek 1.0
> > >
> > > When i search with one word, everything works perfect.
> > >
> > > When i search with 2 or more words seperarted by space, an error
> > > occurs and typically searchd -D  is gone/dies
> >
> > First, please don't ask ASPSeek-related questions at MnogoSearch webboard.
> > ASPSeek and MnogoSearch are completely unrelated and even competing projects.
> >
> > Second, I suspect that your compiler is weird. Please try to recompile searchd
> > without -O2 flag. To do that, run
> >
> > CXXFLAGS="-g -O0" ./configure --your-options
> > make clean
> > cd src
> > make searchd
> >
> > then manually install searchd to /usr/local/aspseek/sbin/ (or there you have it)
> > and restart (killall -TERM searchd; sleep 5; ./searchd -D)
> >
> > Try your search again. If it is ok and searchd is stable now, blame your compiler,
> > or, better, upgrade it. It it is not, please take sure that your running searchd
> > is really compiled without -O2, and then blame us. No! Don't blame, just send a
> > bug report to ase...@li..., and tell all the details.
> >
> > BTW to subscribe to aseek-users, please send "subsribe aseek-users" in the
> > body of the message to maj...@li.... This list is a definitive
> > place for ASPSeek users' problems.
> >
> > -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
> > "Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some interesting
> >  and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.
> >

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
"Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some interesting
 and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: 2 words in search s.cgi causes an error

[Brett <br...@bp...>]

I had the same problem using gcc (2.95) it seemed to fix the problem once I
upgraded to 2.96 and recompiled. Unfortunately it never complained when I
originally compiled it with the older version.

Also, the 2.95 version was from a mandrake rpm versus the 2.96 version which
was redhat rpm...

--Brett

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kir Kolyshkin" <ki...@as...>
To: "rob" <ap...@li...>; <ase...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 10:59 AM
Subject: [aseek-users] Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: 2 words in search s.cgi
causes an error


> rob wrote:
> > I successfully indexed 30,000 websites. with aspseek 1.0
> >
> > When i search with one word, everything works perfect.
> >
> > When i search with 2 or more words seperarted by space, an error
> > occurs and typically searchd -D  is gone/dies
>
> First, please don't ask ASPSeek-related questions at MnogoSearch webboard.
> ASPSeek and MnogoSearch are completely unrelated and even competing
projects.
>
> Second, I suspect that your compiler is weird. Please try to recompile
searchd
> without -O2 flag. To do that, run
>
> CXXFLAGS="-g -O0" ./configure --your-options
> make clean
> cd src
> make searchd
>
> then manually install searchd to /usr/local/aspseek/sbin/ (or there you
have it)
> and restart (killall -TERM searchd; sleep 5; ./searchd -D)
>
> Try your search again. If it is ok and searchd is stable now, blame your
compiler,
> or, better, upgrade it. It it is not, please take sure that your running
searchd
> is really compiled without -O2, and then blame us. No! Don't blame, just
send a
> bug report to ase...@li..., and tell all the details.
>
> BTW to subscribe to aseek-users, please send "subsribe aseek-users" in the
> body of the message to maj...@li.... This list is a
definitive
> place for ASPSeek users' problems.
>
> -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
> "Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some
interesting
>  and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.
>

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: 2 words in search s.cgi causes an error

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

rob wrote:
> I successfully indexed 30,000 websites. with aspseek 1.0
> 
> When i search with one word, everything works perfect.
> 
> When i search with 2 or more words seperarted by space, an error
> occurs and typically searchd -D  is gone/dies

First, please don't ask ASPSeek-related questions at MnogoSearch webboard.
ASPSeek and MnogoSearch are completely unrelated and even competing projects.

Second, I suspect that your compiler is weird. Please try to recompile searchd
without -O2 flag. To do that, run

CXXFLAGS="-g -O0" ./configure --your-options
make clean
cd src
make searchd

then manually install searchd to /usr/local/aspseek/sbin/ (or there you have it)
and restart (killall -TERM searchd; sleep 5; ./searchd -D)

Try your search again. If it is ok and searchd is stable now, blame your compiler,
or, better, upgrade it. It it is not, please take sure that your running searchd
is really compiled without -O2, and then blame us. No! Don't blame, just send a
bug report to ase...@li..., and tell all the details.

BTW to subscribe to aseek-users, please send "subsribe aseek-users" in the
body of the message to maj...@li.... This list is a definitive
place for ASPSeek users' problems.

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
"Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some interesting
 and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] Re: [aseek]: Question About ASPSeek

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

akmjsuber wrote:
> 
> Can aspseek be used with Oracle instead MySql?
> 
> Thanks
> Adam

Well, our 1.1.0 version will be able to use different SQL servers, not just
MySQL. Drivers for PostgreSQL and Oracle will be the first one available.
If all will go smooth, we expect that ASPSeek/Oracle will be available in a
month or two...

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
"Ok, the guy who made the netfilter Makefile was probably on some interesting
 and probably illegal drugs when we wrote it."  -- Linus Torvalds.

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] Re: [aseek]: Separate frontend and backend machines

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

According to RFC1945, all redirection URLs should be absolute.

Quote:
"10.11  Location

   The Location response-header field defines the exact location of the
   resource that was identified by the Request-URI. For 3xx responses,
   the location must indicate the server's preferred URL for automatic
   redirection to the resource. Only one absolute URL is allowed.

       Location       = "Location" ":" absoluteURI

   An example is

       Location: http://www.w3.org/hypertext/WWW/NewLocation.html"


PS Could you please subscribe to aseek-users@, so we will discuss all the
stuff there? Send "subscribe aseek-users" to maj...@li...

Thomas Lund wrote:
> 
> Nope - didn't get the error when changing charset back to what I had (at
> some point). Problem is gone. Weird.
> 
> Different question.
> 
> If you go to the URL:
> 
> http://intranet.enovasion.dk/cgi-bin/s.cgi?tmpl=/web/intranet.enovasion.dk/um.html
> I have put up a test for one of our customers. Try searching on the word
> "Danida". The 2 uppermost hits are documents that redirect the user over
> to some .asp sites with the real content. But the word danida is in the
> title.
> 
> If you press the cached result link for one of them then the cached
> copies redirect the browser to a relative url that does not exists on
> the machine with the search frontend.
> 
> Do you expand URL links in your cached copies, or do you just save the
> relative URL's? Maybe you missed the possibility to have redirects in
> the <head> section. The 2 redirects we have are build up like the file
> attached.
> 
> It is possible for us to change all redirections to be absolute, but it
> would be nice to have this done automatically.
> 
> /Thomas
> 
> Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> 
> > About that stupid ' bug in searchd. Have you changed charsets or something
> > like that? If you done that, please send us files...maybe there's a bug there.
> >
> > BTW We recently added more charsets recently, if you want some, we'll
> > send it to you.
> >
> > -- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
> > There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
> >                                                   (C) 1982, Alan J. Perlis
> 
>   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <html>
> <head>
> <title>Danida Publikationsliste</title>
> <!-- <meta http-equiv="REFRESH" content="0; url=/cgi-bin/dyn3nt/dyn3.exe?prog=show&pageid=127"> link til gammel dynamic visningsside -->
> <meta http-equiv="REFRESH" content="0; url=/aspfiles/ny_pub_oversigt.asp">
> </head>
> <body>
> </body>
> </html>

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
                                                  (C) 1982, Alan J. Perlis

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] Re: [aseek]: Strange error

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> 
> sp...@nu... wrote:
> > When i send queryes by s.cgi to searchd. it make core dump when query contain
> > more than 1 word.
> 
> Maybe your compiler is broken. Yes, I'm serious. Try to compile searchd
> without -O2. Like this
> 
> cd aspseek-1.0.1
> CXXFLAGS="-O0" ./configure
> cd src
> make clean
> make searchd
> killall -TERM searchd
> then install new searchd by hand and re-run it. If it will fail again,
> please contact us. If it will not, upgrade (and blame) your compiler.

Or, you can try to remove "inline" word in function GetWeight in search.cpp
and recompile as usual, with -O2. Seems that this very inline is cause of the
compiler troubles. It just mess up with inlined recursive functions (in theory
it should generate two versions - inlined and not-inlined, second one for
recursive calls).

Or, it's the best solution, upgrade your compiler to something sensible.
g++ from RedHat 6.2 should work (at least it works for us here).

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
                                                  (C) 1982, Alan J. Perlis

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] Re: [aseek]: Strange error

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

sp...@nu... wrote:
> When i send queryes by s.cgi to searchd. it make core dump when query contain
> more than 1 word.

Maybe your compiler is broken. Yes, I'm serious. Try to compile searchd
without -O2. Like this

cd aspseek-1.0.1
CXXFLAGS="-O0" ./configure
cd src
make clean
make searchd
killall -TERM searchd
then install new searchd by hand and re-run it. If it will fail again,
please contact us. If it will not, upgrade (and blame) your compiler.

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
                                                  (C) 1982, Alan J. Perlis

[aspseek-users] Re: [aseek-users] First Timer

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

Brett Pappas wrote:
> 
> I just subscribed to this list because I am having trouble getting my template
> for aspseek to parse all of the variables like $dm, $dy etc... They are just
> showing up as dm, dy... Can anyone help with this or if this has been asked in
> the past then is there an online archive of this mailing list somewhere?

Well, it's not implemented at the moment. You mean you want all your settings
about time limits to show up on result pages? I thought there's no need for
that, you can write separate html file for "advanced search" that will have
all possible options available and will call the script. This is how most
search engines do.

If you still want $dm, $dy etc. to be parsed, please tell, and I'll
implement it when I'll have time.

Thank you for interest in ASPSeek! Can you send us URL of your search?

Kir.

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
                                                  (C) 1982, Alan J. Perlis

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] First Timer

[Brett P. <br...@bp...>]

I just subscribed to this list because I am having trouble getting my template
for aspseek to parse all of the variables like $dm, $dy etc... They are just
showing up as dm, dy... Can anyone help with this or if this has been asked in
the past then is there an online archive of this mailing list somewhere?

--Brett

[aspseek-users] [aseek-users] Re: [aseek]: Separate frontend and backend machines

[Kir K. <ki...@as...>]

tl...@id... wrote:

> What I cannot do (and really would like to) is to tell the s.cgi program to connect
> to the machine running the searchd. Where and hwo do I tell it that searchd does not
> run on the localhost?
> 
> Hope you can help me on this.

Well, it's as easy as finding the line DaemonAddress at the top of etc/s.htm file
and replacing 127.0.0.1 to your daemon address. You should also allow access to
searchd from frontend machine. To do that, replace AllowFrom 127.0.0.1 directive
in searchd.conf to IP of your frontend machine, and restart searchd.

> BTW - FANTASTIC program.

Thanx!

Please report about your further progress with ASPSeek.

-- |< [] [] |_    ki...@as...    http://kir.sever.net   ICQ 7551596 --
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
                                                  (C) 1982, Alan J. Perlis