From: hammett <ha...@uo...> - 2005-01-03 18:56:47
|
----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Henry Concei=E7=E3o" <hen...@gm...> > Because in that way the Aspect# Team will have the full control of > the interfaces. With the full control of the interfaces we can had a > better management of changes(protecting the users from unexpected > changes and compatibilities breaks) and can add some performance > optimizations. Just to clarify some more... The whole idea of AopAlliance is cool, meani= ng=20 that we have an "independent" entity to control the interfaces and=20 specifications that implementors might choose to adhere. While this is=20 stands true for the Java community, it lacks committment for the .Net=20 community. If you - reading this - as an user thinks that the Aspect# should continu= e=20 to adhere to AopAlliance, please manifest now. We're very inclined to bra= ke=20 the aggreement in favor and protection of our user community. -- Cheers, hammett http://www.digitalcraftsmen.com.br/~hammett |