Re: [Aspectsharp-users] Roadmap

[<hen...@gm...>]

Inlines.

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:35:59 -0800, hammett <ha...@uo...> wrote:
> Hiya!
> What do you think about agreeing on a Roadmap?
>=20
> I raise the following points:
>=20
> - To support or not support attributes?
>   If so, do you have an example of how it would be/work?

Reviewing my standpoint, I don't think that is necessary more
configuration approaches. Either XML or Attributes are much complex
and less descritive ways comparing with the bult-in language(we could
name it...)

>=20
> - Drop AopAlliance compatibility

+1=20

>   Why? The AopAlliance interfaces are rubbish. It was just a blind
>   port of the Java version. Also the AopAlliance.IInvocation doesn't help=
 us
>   to optimize the invocations. We can't cache the IInvocation cause it
> stores
>   the arguments (if we do, in a multithread situation we'll have problems=
)
> or we can
>   develop a thread affinity cache, which is complex and we not meant to b=
e
> that complex.
>=20
> - Any more directions to grow?

A tool for static weaving?=20
Some debug facilities like debbugable proxies or interceptor chain trace?

>=20
> --
> Cheers,
> hammett
> http://www.digitalcraftsmen.com.br/~hammett
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
> LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D5588&alloc_id=3D12065&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> Aspectsharp-users mailing list
> Asp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users
>=20


--=20
Cheers,
Henry Concei=E7=E3o