From: <hen...@gm...> - 2004-10-27 19:28:45
|
+1 in put it off for now. And further changes in the proxy serialization won't affect the users that follow this strategy ( I think so ). On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:19:31 -0700, hammett <ha...@uo...> wrote: > But which one? Put it off or implement this beast? :-) > I'm +1 to put it off for now 'til castle development and prevalence > integration is the under way.. >=20 > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://www.digitalcraftsmen.com.br/~hammett >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Henry Concei=E7=E3o" <hen...@gm...> > To: "hammett" <ha...@uo...> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:49 AM > Subject: Re: [Aspectsharp-users] Possible solution to serialization issue= s >=20 > I think that it for now is good enough... :-) >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id=12065&opclick >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Aspectsharp-users mailing list > Asp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users >=20 --=20 Cheers, Henry Concei=E7=E3o |