From: Mike D. <mik...@gm...> - 2004-10-26 20:23:17
|
+1 - to allowing non-virtual methods and not intercepting them Keep up the good work! Mike On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:32:10 -0300, Henry Concei=E7=E3o <hen...@gm...> wrote: > I like this way more than throw an exception or ignore the method >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:38:25 -0700, hammett <ha...@uo...> wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I was thinking about it again, and now its safe to allow non-virtual me= thods > > in the classes being proxied as just one instance will exist. The resul= t is: > > non-virtual methods wont be intercepted... > > > > What are your thoughts? > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > hammett > > http://www.digitalcraftsmen.com.br/~hammett > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJourna= l > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give = us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out = more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > Aspectsharp-users mailing list > > Asp...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users > > >=20 >=20 > -- > Cheers, > Henry Concei=E7=E3o >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out mo= re > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Aspectsharp-users mailing list > Asp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users > |