Re: [Aspectsharp-users] DynamicProxy

[hammett <ha...@uo...>]

Ok, both fixed. The protected/internal/interal protected were bugs.. :-(
I'm working on the serialization issues pointed by Henry and a small release 
should be available on Aspect# CVS tonight.

But although its possible to generate stubs for non-public methods, they 
need to be accessed with a proxy pointer (the this reference is not 
proxied).
Cglib handles is gracefully - only God knows how - but I think it will be 
amazingly difficult to tackle. Ideas?

--
Cheers,
hammett
http://www.digitalcraftsmen.com.br/~hammett


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "hammett" <ha...@uo...>
To: <asp...@li...>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Aspectsharp-users] DynamicProxy


> Hello Mike,
>
> We're currently moving our codebase from ASF, so expect a different 
> namespace. I antecipate my apologies! :-)
>
> Well, the public constructor isnt a problem, really. I think the 
> requirement came from  our lazyness.
>
> protected ConstructorBuilder GenerateConstructor()
> {
> ConstructorBuilder consBuilder = m_typeBuilder.DefineConstructor(
>  MethodAttributes.Public,
>  CallingConventions.Standard,
>  new Type[] {typeof (IInvocationHandler)});
>
> ILGenerator ilGenerator = consBuilder.GetILGenerator();
> ilGenerator.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
> ilGenerator.Emit(OpCodes.Call, m_baseType.GetConstructor(new Type[0]));
> ilGenerator.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
> ilGenerator.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_1);
> ilGenerator.Emit(OpCodes.Stfld, m_handlerField);
> ilGenerator.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
>
> return consBuilder;
> }
>
> I'll change the baseType.GetConstructor to be smarter.
> About the protected methods, I'd better write a test case before I answer 
> that, but should not be a problem....