Fw: [Aspectsharp-users] Next Iteration

[hammett <ha...@uo...>]

I think you forgot to cc the list :-)

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Henry Concei=E7=E3o" <hen...@gm...>
To: "hammett" <ha...@uo...>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Aspectsharp-users] Next Iteration


inlines

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 17:46:39 -0700, hammett <ha...@uo...> wrote:
> Well, =CF'm not really sure about a formal to do list. We need to discu=
ss a
> few topics, though:
>
> - AOPAlliance
>
> Provide this compatibility is nice for our users, but I must say that t=
he
> AopAlliance interfaces are not well defined. A few changes could help u=
s=20
> to
> achieve better performance

We can propose the changes to the AOPAlliance, but I think that the
interfaces don't will be modified soo easy...

>
> - Semantic checking
>
> The semantic check is not checking if the custom matcher actually=20
> implements
> the IClassMatcher interface cause this would lead us to a cyclic assemb=
ly
> references. What do you think about moving the important interfaces to=20
> other
> assembly? This could solve this problem but introduce more aggravations=
 to
> our users.

Today an assembly have to refer the AspectSharp assembly and/or the
AopAlliance Assembly. I was thinking in something like
"Nunit.Framework assembly" , but the AspectEngine can't be moved in a
simple way.

>
> - Caching
>
> There are lots of points in the code that will benefit from caching. To=
day
> Aspect# performance is far from a Good Enough. I haven't spent much tim=
e
> thinking about caching, though. You could come up with a few strategies=
.

I promise think about.

>
> This is the list off top of my head, I'm sure there are plenty more top=
ics
> to be covered...
>
> Cheers,
> hammett
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henry Concei=E7=E3o" <hen...@gm...>
> To: <asp...@li...>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1:20 PM
> Subject: [Aspectsharp-users] Next Iteration
>
> Hammett, could you send to us the TODO list?
>
> And what you guys think about start the refactoring of the Interceptor
> Model?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Henry Concei=E7=E3o
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJourna=
l
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give =
us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out=20
> more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Aspectsharp-users mailing list
> Asp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJourna=
l
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give =
us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out=20
> more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Aspectsharp-users mailing list
> Asp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users
>


--=20
Cheers,
Henry Concei=E7=E3o=20