Menu
▾
▴
aspectsharp-users — Users discussion list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
担当の木下です。 仁美さんから貴方へのメッセージを特別にあずかりましたのでご紹介します。 〜〜〜転送メール内容〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜 >あなたも内緒のお付き合いがベストですよね。 >私も周囲には気づかれたくありません。あくまでも内緒で。 >なので今回の特別招待という形で、気に入った男性の方にだけ >という限定数という条件がピッタリでした。 >無料メール、セキュリティ専用ボックスなので、そのへんも安心ですよね。 > >夜ならログインしていると思います。 >時間作ってもらえませんか。返信お願いします。 〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜 綾さんのプライベートルーム http://www.omoiwo.com/jewel/w256u 安心してプライベートルームの作成するにあたり、 ３つのお約束を宣言しています。 其の１）紹介料は一切ナシ 其の２）近所エリアの女性のみ 其の３）不正行為は一切ナシ http://www.omoiwo.com/jewel/w256u ご不明な点があれば私までお問い合わせください。 |
無料メールをご存知ですか？ 担当の木下です。 プライベートルームで綾さんに先ほどのお答えをして あげる際は、専用メールフォームで送って下さい。 もちろん費用は掛かりません。 http://www.omoiwo.com/jewel/w256u お二人で連絡をとる方法については、JEWELプライベートルームで ご確認下さい。 あくまでも秘密である場合は、女性との連絡用のメールアドレスを １つご用意ください。フリーメールアドレスでも可能です。 不明点は何なりと私まで。 |
|
From: <wil...@in...> - 2007-09-02 20:58:25
|
JEWELの木下と申します。 大変お忙しいところをご覧いただき誠に有難うございます。 さて、早速ですが、 該当の皆様は大変にラッキーなお知らせ、 ☆JEWELからの特別招待状を、該当者の方にご連絡しております ご招待スペシャルは特に問い合わせが多くなっておりまして ご当人が対応できないとのことになり、今回から限定になりました。 数名の該当者様だけの優先プランで、より親密になれるのではと 考えています。 ☆限定第一弾！！ JEWELプライベートルーム紹介番号256 綾さん http://www.premia1.com/jewel/w256u 大型掲示板とメールボックスのシステム導入で、 さらにパワーアップ！全国版aimapに対応、もちろん完全無料は 今まで通り変わりません！ どうぞ、招待スペシャル期間で特別な時間を過ごして下さい。 |
|
From: ü÷ <xc3...@ya...> - 2007-07-18 11:06:43
|
はじめまして美樹です。 掲示板で見て趣味合うかなって思ってメールしちゃいました。 イキナリでゴメンなさいm(__)m こういう感じで知り合えるのに憧れてて初挑戦しちゃいました。 お返事もらえたら簡単な自己紹介しますネ(^_-)-☆ もしそんな気なかったらそう言ってもらえれば諦めますので。 もちろん仲良くなれた方が嬉しいけど。 お返事気長に待ってま〜す(^_^)/~ http://www.star-lightz.com/m-box |
|
From: <hel...@ma...> - 2007-02-24 23:03:02
|
わたし、ずっと待っているんです。。 メールを見てくれて分かってくれたと思っていました。 ずっとずっと前から考えていた事だから。。 二人で行こうって言ってくれたのは嘘じゃないって 今でも信じています。広くて景色のいいお風呂、 ふたりだけの時間、特別な夜にしようって、あの時。 http://www.white-parasol.com/fpass/sroom ここのフリーの伝言板は、 男女無料参加でいつも使っているところなので、 こっちのほうならお金掛からないから、絶対安心。 あなたのこと、あきらめきれない私、 特別な夜を期待して、伝言板で待ってます。。 |
|
From: Rodrigo B. de O. <rod...@gm...> - 2005-09-02 19:49:07
|
This patch fixes ComponentsTestCase which assumes '\r\n' line ending. The test cases were failing here and now they run through ok. --=20 bamboo |
|
From: Tatham O. <tat...@fu...> - 2005-06-04 06:02:47
|
Henry,=20 I noticed you have just dumped in the latest revision, without bringing across previous revisions or log messages. Wouldn't the logs at least be useful? http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ Thanks, Tatham Oddie Technical Director, Fuel Advance www.fueladvance.com -----Original Message----- From: cas...@li... [mailto:cas...@li...] On Behalf Of = Henry Concei=E7=E3o Sent: Friday, 3 June 2005 12:09 PM To: cas...@li... Cc: asp...@li... Subject: [castle] Aspect# CodeBase Hi, As we said in the previous mails, Aspect# has became part of Castle Project. And now, to seal it, I've 'moved' the codebase of Aspect# from SourceForge's CVS to Castle's SVN. Here the is the new repo url: https://svn.castleproject.org/svn/castle/trunk/AspectSharp --=20 Cheers, Henry Concei=E7=E3o ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit = http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=3Dfad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ http://www.castleproject.org Cas...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/castleproject-devel |
|
From: <hen...@gm...> - 2005-06-03 02:09:50
|
Hi, As we said in the previous mails, Aspect# has became part of Castle Project. And now, to seal it, I've 'moved' the codebase of Aspect# from SourceForge's CVS to Castle's SVN. Here the is the new repo url: https://svn.castleproject.org/svn/castle/trunk/AspectSharp --=20 Cheers, Henry Concei=E7=E3o |
|
From: <hen...@ne...> - 2005-06-02 17:33:27
|
We plan to finish the migration in the next days, but the following resources are online now: New web site: http://www.castleproject.org/index.php/AspectSharp Support Forum: http://forum.castleproject.org/forums/show/14.page JIRA: http://support.castleproject.org/jira/ -----Mensagem original----- De: asp...@li... [mailto:asp...@li...] Em nome de hammett Enviada em: quinta-feira, 2 de junho de 2005 13:37 Para: cas...@li... Cc: asp...@li... Assunto: [Aspectsharp-users] [ANN] Aspect# is moving in Hi there, After a quick discussion on the PMC list, we decided to move Aspect# to Castle. Aspect# will definitely benefit from castle's momentum and find a home with more people willing to support it and improve it. Long live Aspect#! -- Cheers, hammett http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ Aspectsharp-users mailing list Asp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users |
|
From: hammett <ha...@uo...> - 2005-06-02 16:37:43
|
Hi there, After a quick discussion on the PMC list, we decided to move Aspect# to Castle. Aspect# will definitely benefit from castle's momentum and find a home with more people willing to support it and improve it. Long live Aspect#! -- Cheers, hammett http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett |
|
From: <hen...@ne...> - 2005-05-31 16:55:27
|
Hi, Besides Eos(great project, btw) and Aspect# share the same goals, they = have different approaches.=20 Aspect# is a dynamic weaving framework, and pretend continue following = that way. Our challenge is to be less intrusive and perfomatic as it an aop framework can be. And since we (Aspect# Team) don't have a sponsor (our something like = that) it'll continue be developed in your spare time, and accordingly our priorities. Documentation is a big issue of the project; we know it and have plans = to fix ASAP. And *everyone* is invited to contribute, instead complaining = about it our treat us like an employee or subordinated asking "we are the docs that I ask?". Regards, Henry Concei=E7=E3o -----Mensagem original----- De: asp...@li... [mailto:asp...@li...] Em nome de Owen Corpening Enviada em: ter=E7a-feira, 31 de maio de 2005 11:15 Para: 'Rodrigo Vieira'; asp...@li... Cc: eos...@ar... Assunto: RE: [Aspectsharp-users] Simpler tutorial I switched to http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~eos/ and never looked back, = this tool does everything I need and is extremely similar to aspectj, works = well and the developers are very responsive and friendly. You should be able = to do a logging aspect in 5 min - if not let me know be glad to help. Thanks, =20 Owen Corpening Acorn Systems -----Original Message----- From: asp...@li... [mailto:asp...@li...] On Behalf Of = Rodrigo Vieira Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:12 AM To: asp...@li... Subject: [Aspectsharp-users] Simpler tutorial I was checking your project's website, but I gotta confess I am a bit disappointed with the tutorial. I noticed that a guy called Owen Corpening requested a simpler, helloworld-ish sample but all he got back was some vicious answers, RTFM-style answers from one of the developers. If only the code/tests were commented in a way that helped the newcomers to figure out what's going on, but that's not the case. A very simple tutorial, for example adding logging or email functionality to 1 or 2 existing classes/methods, shouldn't be _so_ hard to produce, and would help _a lot_ the average user. Don't mix it with design patterns and other technologies, othwerwise it's hard to understand what's part of your framework and what's not So please rethink your position and do your project a favor, come up with a nice, simple sample, such as the ones available for Python and Java. It can't be _that_ hard ;) Keep it up, Aspect# seems the most interesting AOP framework for .net I've found, but right now it's way too hard for the newcomer to figure it out from the current tutorial. - Rodrigo ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit = http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=3Dfad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ Aspectsharp-users mailing list Asp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit = http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=3Doffad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ Aspectsharp-users mailing list Asp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users |
|
From: Owen C. <oco...@ac...> - 2005-05-31 14:15:55
|
I switched to http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~eos/ and never looked back, this tool does everything I need and is extremely similar to aspectj, works well and the developers are very responsive and friendly. You should be able to do a logging aspect in 5 min - if not let me know be glad to help. Thanks, Owen Corpening Acorn Systems -----Original Message----- From: asp...@li... [mailto:asp...@li...] On Behalf Of Rodrigo Vieira Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:12 AM To: asp...@li... Subject: [Aspectsharp-users] Simpler tutorial I was checking your project's website, but I gotta confess I am a bit disappointed with the tutorial. I noticed that a guy called Owen Corpening requested a simpler, helloworld-ish sample but all he got back was some vicious answers, RTFM-style answers from one of the developers. If only the code/tests were commented in a way that helped the newcomers to figure out what's going on, but that's not the case. A very simple tutorial, for example adding logging or email functionality to 1 or 2 existing classes/methods, shouldn't be _so_ hard to produce, and would help _a lot_ the average user. Don't mix it with design patterns and other technologies, othwerwise it's hard to understand what's part of your framework and what's not So please rethink your position and do your project a favor, come up with a nice, simple sample, such as the ones available for Python and Java. It can't be _that_ hard ;) Keep it up, Aspect# seems the most interesting AOP framework for .net I've found, but right now it's way too hard for the newcomer to figure it out from the current tutorial. - Rodrigo ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=fad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ Aspectsharp-users mailing list Asp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users |
|
From: <hen...@ne...> - 2005-05-31 12:27:29
|
Yeah, It's already in my plans create this kind of sample, in a "Show, don't = tell" fashion. Then, you lazy guys, doesn't need to read a simple page in the = site :-P. But I'm stucked with my graduation thesis for now. So, it will be done = in a 2 or 3 weeks Tks for consideration. -----Mensagem original----- De: asp...@li... [mailto:asp...@li...] Em nome de = Rodrigo Vieira Enviada em: ter=E7a-feira, 31 de maio de 2005 09:12 Para: asp...@li... Assunto: [Aspectsharp-users] Simpler tutorial I was checking your project's website, but I gotta confess I am a bit disappointed with the tutorial. I noticed that a guy called Owen Corpening requested a simpler, helloworld-ish sample but all he got back was some vicious answers, RTFM-style answers from one of the developers. If only the code/tests were commented in a way that helped the newcomers to figure out what's going on, but that's not the case. A very simple tutorial, for example adding logging or email functionality to 1 or 2 existing classes/methods, shouldn't be _so_ hard to produce, and would help _a lot_ the average user. Don't mix it with design patterns and other technologies, othwerwise it's hard to understand what's part of your framework and what's not So please rethink your position and do your project a favor, come up with a nice, simple sample, such as the ones available for Python and Java. It can't be _that_ hard ;) Keep it up, Aspect# seems the most interesting AOP framework for .net I've found, but right now it's way too hard for the newcomer to figure it out from the current tutorial. - Rodrigo ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit = http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=3Dfad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ Aspectsharp-users mailing list Asp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users |
|
From: Rodrigo V. <rod...@gm...> - 2005-05-31 12:11:43
|
I was checking your project's website, but I gotta confess I am a bit disappointed with the tutorial. I noticed that a guy called Owen Corpening requested a simpler, helloworld-ish sample but all he got back was some vicious answers, RTFM-style answers from one of the developers. If only the code/tests were commented in a way that helped the newcomers to figure out what's going on, but that's not the case. A very simple tutorial, for example adding logging or email functionality to 1 or 2 existing classes/methods, shouldn't be _so_ hard to produce, and would help _a lot_ the average user. Don't mix it with design patterns and other technologies, othwerwise it's hard to understand what's part of your framework and what's not So please rethink your position and do your project a favor, come up with a nice, simple sample, such as the ones available for Python and Java. It can't be _that_ hard ;) Keep it up, Aspect# seems the most interesting AOP framework for .net I've found, but right now it's way too hard for the newcomer to figure it out from the current tutorial. - Rodrigo |
|
From: <hen...@gm...> - 2005-05-16 04:54:52
|
Hi, I've released the 2.1.1.0 beta ChangeList: - Castle.DynamicProxy updated to 1.1.0.0 version. You can download it from: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D106883 --=20 Cheers, Henry Concei=E7=E3o |
|
From: Rodrigo B. de O. <rod...@gm...> - 2005-04-04 22:48:17
|
1) Get the ANTLR C# parser to construct a boo[1] AST 2) Write AOP custom attributes and pipelines steps so we all (c# and boo users) could benefit from 3) Let the existing pipeline infrastructure deal with all the rest (expression validation, code emission, etc) [1] http://boo.codehaus.org/ On Apr 4, 2005 2:03 PM, Eduard Ralph <asp...@ed...> wrote: > Hi, > > ok, so that means more work then I had anticipated. I thought they had all > the parts. Hmm, your right - rewriting a C# compiler would be a major > effort. The other thing I looked into was using Mono and just expanding > that. But that would mean getting into all the code. > Hmmm - we will have to see. > > > > Even if I +1 the proposal, I simply don't have the time/energy to invest > on > > it. Contributions are welcomed, though :-) > > So in principle you would say that the approach would be right, but the > amount of effort would be an issue. > I can understand if you would choose not to get into it. I would be willing > to invest the time to build the thing (building a compiler would be > interesting to me anyway). If I prove the point and get it far enough, would > you or someone else on the list want to chip in some? Here again, > contribution welcomed... :-) > > Greets, > > Eduard > |
|
From: Eduard R. <asp...@ed...> - 2005-04-04 17:03:26
|
Hi, ok, so that means more work then I had anticipated. I thought they had all the parts. Hmm, your right - rewriting a C# compiler would be a major effort. The other thing I looked into was using Mono and just expanding that. But that would mean getting into all the code. Hmmm - we will have to see. > Even if I +1 the proposal, I simply don't have the time/energy to invest on > it. Contributions are welcomed, though :-) So in principle you would say that the approach would be right, but the amount of effort would be an issue. I can understand if you would choose not to get into it. I would be willing to invest the time to build the thing (building a compiler would be interesting to me anyway). If I prove the point and get it far enough, would you or someone else on the list want to chip in some? Here again, contribution welcomed... :-) Greets, Eduard |
|
From: hammett <ha...@uo...> - 2005-04-04 16:28:53
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eduard Ralph" <asp...@ed...> > That was one of the reasons I dropped that idea early on. AFAIK ANTLR > already has a C# compiler, so I was thinking just to use that and extend > it. > I don't know in what sort of state it is, so that might be more work too, > but it would probably save a lot of extra hassle, etc. They have a grammar, which is just a small piece of what composes a compiler (lexer and parser). A compiler to C# would take, I don't, maybe a whole year of work... Even if I +1 the proposal, I simply don't have the time/energy to invest on it. Contributions are welcomed, though :-) -- Cheers, hammett http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett |
|
From: Eduard R. <asp...@ed...> - 2005-04-04 15:49:22
|
Hi hammett > > As you've already used ANTLR, I was wondering if it might not be a better > > idea to develop a C# compiler with some added keywords, that contains > > "normal" C# as subset and implement the Aspect features into the compiler > > instead. > Wow! That's quite a move, huh? Instead of a compiler we could develop a > pre-processor, but then we would need to integrate it with VS.Net and > several issues could come afterwards... The thought had occurred to me to do it over a pre-processor. In my experience that generally ends up being an unhappy solution because you generally have a hard time pinning some of the problems. I once worked with a pre-processor from oracle for embedded SQL in C++ and that was a real dog. That was one of the reasons I dropped that idea early on. AFAIK ANTLR already has a C# compiler, so I was thinking just to use that and extend it. I don't know in what sort of state it is, so that might be more work too, but it would probably save a lot of extra hassle, etc. > IMHO it would be best to stick with the dynamic approach, the same used by > dynaop. I'll admit I've written only a few very small compilers so far (hardly worth the name), so the work one would face is probably more then I would believe. I also see that it would be a shame to loose all the effort invested so far. > > For one thing certain limitations like having to declare the methods > > virtual > > for an IMethodInterceptor could be resolved. > If you weave the resulting code, then it's true. I'll also admit I haven't thought it through in every detail, which is why some input from your side would be great. Like I said, I'm just toying with the idea right now. > > For another thing it would also > > allow for realizing Interceptors for constuctors or maybe for assignments > > or > > comparisons. > I thought DynProxy would be able to intercept operators.... I also haven't looked at your code in detail so my thinking might be going in the wrong way. Unfortunately one can't overload the assignment, nor the new operator (which is why you have this engine-builder thing). That means one would never be able to intercept assignments - at least not the ones from builtin types. Of course that would create some security issues as well (which is why they don't allow it in the first place). The other thing that occurred to me in connection with the issue of security and access restriction: as far as I can tell, I can intercept and mix in my code into any object which was instantiated over the engine. It probably would be sensible to somehow include mechanisms to not allow it under certain circumstances (like when something is sealed, etc) but that might be able to be implemented in the current makeup. An own compiler could just make it slightly easier, that is all. Greets, Eduard |
|
From: hammett <ha...@uo...> - 2005-04-04 15:04:57
|
Hello Eduard! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eduard Ralph" <asp...@ed...> > As you've already used ANTLR, I was wondering if it might not be a better > idea to develop a C# compiler with some added keywords, that contains > "normal" C# as subset and implement the Aspect features into the compiler > instead. Wow! That's quite a move, huh? Instead of a compiler we could develop a pre-processor, but then we would need to integrate it with VS.Net and several issues could come afterwards... IMHO it would be best to stick with the dynamic approach, the same used by dynaop. > For one thing certain limitations like having to declare the methods > virtual > for an IMethodInterceptor could be resolved. If you weave the resulting code, then it's true. > For another thing it would also > allow for realizing Interceptors for constuctors or maybe for assignments > or > comparisons. I thought DynProxy would be able to intercept operators.... -- Cheers, hammett http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett |
|
From: Eduard R. <asp...@ed...> - 2005-04-04 14:30:27
|
Hi, I'm just getting into this whole Aspectoriented Programming thing and tried out a bit of your code to get a feel for it. After using it for a homegrown Assert mechanism with Attributes, I really began to appreciate the ideas and concepts. As much as I liked and applaud the library, there seem to be several issues that aren't resolved and there are given limitations through the C# language. As you've already used ANTLR, I was wondering if it might not be a better idea to develop a C# compiler with some added keywords, that contains "normal" C# as subset and implement the Aspect features into the compiler instead. For one thing certain limitations like having to declare the methods virtual for an IMethodInterceptor could be resolved. For another thing it would also allow for realizing Interceptors for constuctors or maybe for assignments or comparisons. Comments, ideas, etc. appreciated Eduard Ralph |
|
From: Owen C. <oco...@ac...> - 2005-03-18 19:25:44
|
Let me rephrase my request: I challenge you (anyone on this list) to produce a short HelloWorld app that uses your aspect technology to do entrance/exit/exception logging. If this is not something you can do in 30 minutes, just say so, and I will move along. EOS provided this in 5 minutes. With AspectJ I could do it in 4 minutes, holding "AspectJ in Action" in one hand. If you give me excrement again I will simply declare your technology unworthy of consideration, that is a most immature way of handling things. Obviously I read your docs and samples, if you are so busy just delete this posting. In my projects a request for a HelloWorld is not treated so contemptuously. Perhaps you shouldn't spend your time programming open source projects if you are going to mistreat people like this. Thanks, Owen Corpening Acorn Systems -----Original Message----- From: asp...@li... [mailto:asp...@li...] On Behalf Of Owen Corpening Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 2:02 AM To: 'hammett'; asp...@li... Subject: RE: Fw: [Aspectsharp-users] examples, docs I love aspect# ! Why is HelloWolrd a burden?? xplain that.Thanks, Owen Corpening Acorn Systems -----Original Message----- From: asp...@li... [mailto:asp...@li...] On Behalf Of hammett Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 8:30 PM To: Owen Corpening; asp...@li... Subject: Re: Fw: [Aspectsharp-users] examples, docs Yes, Owen, you're right. Our project is not serious as we are not concerned with users that are not willing to read the sample application nor the tutorial or the test cases. I think we provide enough resources to people learn by themselves, we haven't had complains. If you want free employees, you should direct your attention towards anything but open source projects. Thank you for _not_ considering Aspect# as a valuable option for you AOP needs. -- Cheers, hammett http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett ----- Original Message ----- From: "Owen Corpening" <oco...@ac...> I emailed the mailing-lists of Aspect#, ApectC#, Weave.NET, Loom.Net, AspectDNG, AOP.NET, and SetPoint. Only one - EOS - responded with a HelloWorld sample app and the command line to compile it. I seriously don't think I was asking for much, otherwise the system must not be worth much if no one in all these lists can even do hello world without fuss. Thanks, Owen Corpening Acorn Systems ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Aspectsharp-users mailing list Asp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Aspectsharp-users mailing list Asp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users |
|
From: Owen C. <oco...@ac...> - 2005-03-18 08:03:44
|
I love aspect# ! Why is HelloWolrd a burden?? xplain that.Thanks, Owen Corpening Acorn Systems -----Original Message----- From: asp...@li... [mailto:asp...@li...] On Behalf Of hammett Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 8:30 PM To: Owen Corpening; asp...@li... Subject: Re: Fw: [Aspectsharp-users] examples, docs Yes, Owen, you're right. Our project is not serious as we are not concerned with users that are not willing to read the sample application nor the tutorial or the test cases. I think we provide enough resources to people learn by themselves, we haven't had complains. If you want free employees, you should direct your attention towards anything but open source projects. Thank you for _not_ considering Aspect# as a valuable option for you AOP needs. -- Cheers, hammett http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett ----- Original Message ----- From: "Owen Corpening" <oco...@ac...> I emailed the mailing-lists of Aspect#, ApectC#, Weave.NET, Loom.Net, AspectDNG, AOP.NET, and SetPoint. Only one - EOS - responded with a HelloWorld sample app and the command line to compile it. I seriously don't think I was asking for much, otherwise the system must not be worth much if no one in all these lists can even do hello world without fuss. Thanks, Owen Corpening Acorn Systems ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Aspectsharp-users mailing list Asp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users |
|
From: hammett <ha...@uo...> - 2005-03-18 02:30:18
|
Yes, Owen, you're right. Our project is not serious as we are not concerned with users that are not willing to read the sample application nor the tutorial or the test cases. I think we provide enough resources to people learn by themselves, we haven't had complains. If you want free employees, you should direct your attention towards anything but open source projects. Thank you for _not_ considering Aspect# as a valuable option for you AOP needs. -- Cheers, hammett http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett ----- Original Message ----- From: "Owen Corpening" <oco...@ac...> I emailed the mailing-lists of Aspect#, ApectC#, Weave.NET, Loom.Net, AspectDNG, AOP.NET, and SetPoint. Only one - EOS - responded with a HelloWorld sample app and the command line to compile it. I seriously don't think I was asking for much, otherwise the system must not be worth much if no one in all these lists can even do hello world without fuss. Thanks, Owen Corpening Acorn Systems |
|
From: Owen C. <oco...@ac...> - 2005-03-17 21:16:42
|
I emailed the mailing-lists of Aspect#, ApectC#, Weave.NET, Loom.Net, AspectDNG, AOP.NET, and SetPoint. Only one - EOS - responded with a HelloWorld sample app and the command line to compile it. I seriously don't think I was asking for much, otherwise the system must = not be worth much if no one in all these lists can even do hello world = without fuss. Thanks, =20 Owen Corpening Acorn Systems -----Original Message----- From: asp...@li... [mailto:asp...@li...] On Behalf Of = Henry Concei=E7=E3o Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 8:27 PM To: asp...@li... Subject: Re: Fw: [Aspectsharp-users] examples, docs I'll create a simple example, but it won't be avaliable soon... sorry. The final beta release should came in the next 3 or 4 weeks. The http://aspectsharp.sourceforge.net/tutorial.html and the src/AspectSharpTests/InterceptorTests/InterceptorTestCase.cs has a overview of the example that should help you understand the AspectSharp. The testcases are very simple and should take only a few minutes to read it. On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:14:29 -0300, hammett <ha...@uo...> wrote: > Would somebody please answer this request? I need to put a web project > online today. >=20 > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Owen Corpening" <oco...@ac...> >=20 > > That is a relatively mammoth example to get started with - you can > > probably > > imagine that I have a day job and can't initially invest heavily in = an > > unkown quantity - is there more of a helloworld - type thing you = could > > cobble together for me? > > > > If Aspect# is truly simple and easy to use this request should take almost > > no time at all. Might want to add such an example to the src too. > > > > Even the tutorial is actually too much for evaluation purposes. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Owen Corpening > > Acorn Systems >=20 >=20 --=20 Cheers, Henry Concei=E7=E3o ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id=14396&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ Aspectsharp-users mailing list Asp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aspectsharp-users |
