Menu
▾
▴
Re: [ASL] ASL questions
|
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2002-09-06 02:47:21
|
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 da...@st... wrote: -> ->> Are you using host specific routes, that is all subnet masks are ->> 255.255.255.255. If so then the behavior you depict should not be ->> observed. In any case I cant really conclude much without looking at ->> the ->> logs. If you have the DEBUG flag enabled (README tell you where to do ->> this), try looking at the output to see whats happening. -> ->Would host specific routes be set before the routing daemon is started or by ->the routing daemon itself? I dont have my laptop here, but if I remember ->correctly the routing table that is displayed when the defferred route for ->0.0.0.0 is added looks like the following: -> ->Dest Gateway Genmask Flags Interface ->10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U eth1 ->127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U lo ->0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U tun ->0.0.0.0 10.1.1.2 0.0.0.0 UG eth1 -> ->I assume that the last entry is the defferred route added by my routing ->daemon, and I'm not sure, but woudl the first entry be the reason why any ->connections to 10.x.x.x dont get sent to the routing daemon? -> Yes. You should ensure that the first entry is not there and the routes added by the routing daemon should be like : ->10.1.1.2 10.1.1.x 255.255.255.255 UH eth1 This is if you want host specific routes, which is typically the case in ad-hoc networks. ..vikas -> -> -> ->------------------------------------------------------- ->This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old ->cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! ->https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 ->_______________________________________________ ->aslib-users mailing list ->asl...@li... ->https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aslib-users -> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Vikas Kawadia ------------- http://www.uiuc.edu/~kawadia -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
