You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(11) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Giuseppe C. <giu...@gm...> - 2013-06-26 14:42:59
|
I searched to install the route_check module in my pc, I run ubuntu 10.04 kernel v2.6, when i prove to install the module and type the make command i received some errors, I resolved more of there changed the path in MakeFile but i could not install the route_check module because i received other errors such as error: invalid use of undefined type ‘struct nf_hook_ops’ I tried to install the module route_check in my pc, I ran 10.04 kernel v2.6, when I try to install the module and I type the make command received some errors, I fixed some errors by changing the path in makefile but I could not install the form route_check because I received other errors as error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct nf_hook_ops' where is the problem? Thanks! |
From: ch.montp <ch....@la...> - 2008-08-08 00:23:24
|
Hi, I'm french, I'd like to find a course in information management. I don't know very much the qualification types in Scotland. I have the equivalent of a three-year university degree and I'd like to have a short qualification (maybe in a part-time in order to work as information officer at the same time). I know it's certainly too late to apply but are there any courses we could recommand me ? Thank you Regards, Christelle C. Créez votre adresse électronique pre...@la... 1 Go d'espace de stockage, anti-spam et anti-virus intégrés. |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-08-31 02:55:13
|
Try Kismet <http://www.kismetwireless.net>. It puts the card in RFmon mode, and can detect and log every packet in range, even ones it cannot decode or are no on the same essid. You can set it to cycle through various channels as well. -vikas On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Luo Yang wrote: ->Dear all: -> ->I'm doing a project on the wireless 802.11b MAC layer design, trying to ->send out MAC packets to AP and receive the response from AP as normal ->802.11b cards. -> ->I have a problem now that both AP and sniffer card can't receive the ->packets send by my card. The data frame is correct before it enters the ->modulator, according to the output from digital oscilloscope. With a ->spectrum analyzer and a wide band antenna, I can see the packet sent out ->to air from the RF antenna, at channel 13. -> ->I'm using Airopeek, a software to receive every packet in the air, and a ->normal 802.11b card to receive the pacets sent by the modified card. But ->it can't receive anything from it. -> ->My question is, is there any tool can receive and store every byte ->received at the card. I hope to find that maybe part of the packet ->received at the normal card. -> ->Thanks -> ->Luo Yang -> -- |
From: Luo Y. <EY...@nt...> - 2004-08-31 02:14:18
|
Dear all: =20 I'm doing a project on the wireless 802.11b MAC layer design, trying to send out MAC packets to AP and receive the response from AP as normal 802.11b cards.=20 =20 I have a problem now that both AP and sniffer card can't receive the packets send by my card. The data frame is correct before it enters the modulator, according to the output from digital oscilloscope. With a spectrum analyzer and a wide band antenna, I can see the packet sent out to air from the RF antenna, at channel 13.=20 =20 I'm using Airopeek, a software to receive every packet in the air, and a normal 802.11b card to receive the pacets sent by the modified card. But it can't receive anything from it.=20 =20 My question is, is there any tool can receive and store every byte received at the card. I hope to find that maybe part of the packet received at the normal card. =20 Thanks =20 Luo Yang |
From: Luo Y. <EY...@nt...> - 2004-07-20 09:22:38
|
Hello Vikas: I followed your instructions and the data flow works now!!!=20 Thanks a lot! Luo Yang From: Vikas Kawadia [mailto:ka...@co...]=20 To: Luo Yang Cc: asl...@li... I think I know your problem now. You should enable ip forwarding in your kernel and also turn off icmp=20 redirects. The fastest way would be to copy the snippet provided below onto=20 /etc/sysctl.conf and then run sysctl -p -vikas #------------------------------------- ### /etc/sysctl.conf # Enable packet forwarding net.ipv4.ip_forward =3D 1 # Enables source route verification net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter =3D = 1 # Enable the magic-sysrq key kernel.sysrq =3D 1 # Controls whether core dumps will append the PID to the core filename. # Useful for debugging multi-threaded applications. kernel.core_uses_pid =3D 1 # disable all redirecting # useful in forcing certain topologies # escpecially when a weak link exists net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects =3D 0 net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_redirects =3D 0 net.ipv4.conf.default.secure_redirects =3D 0 net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects =3D 0 = net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_redirects =3D 0 net.ipv4.conf.all.secure_redirects =3D 0 #----------------------------------------- |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-07-20 07:11:15
|
I think I know your problem now. You should enable ip forwarding in your kernel and also turn off icmp redirects. The fastest way would be to copy the snippet provided below onto /etc/sysctl.conf and then run sysctl -p -vikas #------------------------------------- ### /etc/sysctl.conf # Enable packet forwarding net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 # Enables source route verification net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1 # Enable the magic-sysrq key kernel.sysrq = 1 # Controls whether core dumps will append the PID to the core filename. # Useful for debugging multi-threaded applications. kernel.core_uses_pid = 1 # disable all redirecting # useful in forcing certain topologies # escpecially when a weak link exists net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects = 0 net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_redirects = 0 net.ipv4.conf.default.secure_redirects = 0 net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects = 0 net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_redirects = 0 net.ipv4.conf.all.secure_redirects = 0 #----------------------------------------- On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Luo Yang wrote: ->Vikas: -> Thank you for your quick reply. -> ->When I tried to move all machines together, i.e. every node can see the ->other two nodes directly, The PING test between any two nodes was ->successful, so it is with SSH. But both failed when it requires a ->multi-hop. -> ->* There's another thing I don't know whether it's helpful. When I ->compile the AODV-UIUC source code, I got one warning message: ->================== ->aodv.cc: In member function `void aodv::resendRREQ(void*)': ->aodv.cc:1033: warning: taking address of temporary ->================== -> ->* I also checked the iptables with "iptables -L", the output is: -> [root@localhost /]# iptables -L -> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) -> target prot opt source destination -> -> -> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) -> target prot opt source destination -> -> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) -> target prot opt source destination -> ->The table is empty. Should I add some entry to the Chain FORWARD? -> ->Thanks ->Luo Yang -> ->From: Vikas Kawadia [mailto:ka...@co...] ->To: Luo Yang ->Cc: asl...@li... ->Subject: Re: [ASL] AODV-UIUC help -> -> -> ->There are too many things in a "system configuration: to just "kindly ->tell". -> ->As a first guess, I would suspect you have turned on a firewall ->(iptables) ->which is eating up all the ping packets. -> ->Can you ssh. -> ->-vikas -> -> ->On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Luo Yang wrote: -> ->->Dear all: ->-> During last few weeks I was trying to setup AODV-UIUC on 2 ->notebooks ->->and 1 desktop. So far: ->->* The ASL-a-0.5, AODV-UIUC-0.5 are successfully compiled/installed ->->* each node able to find neighbours using HELLO and KRT updated ->->* When I tried to PING a unknown node(10.1.1.3) from node ->->10.1.1.4, the AODV program worked well, adding route to the node in ->->the KRT.I type the KRT of 10.1.1.4 below: ->->DEST Gateway Genmask Flags ->->Metric Ref Use Iface ->->10.1.1.3 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 UGH ->->0 0 0 eth1 ->->10.1.1.2 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.255 UGH ->->0 0 0 eth1 ->->127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 ->->U 0 0 0 lo ->->default * 0.0.0.0 ->->U 0 0 0 tun ->-> ->-> The network topology is shown below: ->-> 10.1.1.4 <----------->10.1.1.2 <----------------> ->->10.1.1.3 ->-> ->-> Well, my problem is although the AODV works fine, but my data is ->not ->->transmitted as it should be. When I PING 10.1.1.3 from 10.1.1.4. I can -> ->->saw the KRT updated but there wasn't any reply received at 10.1.1.4. I -> ->->doubt it's due to the system configuration since routing table is ->->correct. ->-> ->-> I'm using RedHat 8.0 (kernel 2.4.18-14). Can u kindly tell me ->what ->->system configuration I should use to overcome the problem? ->-> ->-> Thank you for your kind help ->-> -> -> -- |
From: Luo Y. <EY...@nt...> - 2004-07-20 06:13:29
|
Vikas: Thank you for your quick reply. When I tried to move all machines together, i.e. every node can see the other two nodes directly, The PING test between any two nodes was successful, so it is with SSH. But both failed when it requires a multi-hop.=20 * There's another thing I don't know whether it's helpful. When I compile the AODV-UIUC source code, I got one warning message: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D aodv.cc: In member function `void aodv::resendRREQ(void*)': aodv.cc:1033: warning: taking address of temporary =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D * I also checked the iptables with "iptables -L", the output is: [root@localhost /]# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination =20 Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination The table is empty. Should I add some entry to the Chain FORWARD? Thanks Luo Yang From: Vikas Kawadia [mailto:ka...@co...]=20 To: Luo Yang Cc: asl...@li... Subject: Re: [ASL] AODV-UIUC help There are too many things in a "system configuration: to just "kindly=20 tell".=20 As a first guess, I would suspect you have turned on a firewall (iptables)=20 which is eating up all the ping packets. Can you ssh. -vikas On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Luo Yang wrote: ->Dear all: -> During last few weeks I was trying to setup AODV-UIUC on 2 notebooks=20 ->and 1 desktop. So far: ->* The ASL-a-0.5, AODV-UIUC-0.5 are successfully compiled/installed ->* each node able to find neighbours using HELLO and KRT updated ->* When I tried to PING a unknown node(10.1.1.3) from node ->10.1.1.4, the AODV program worked well, adding route to the node in=20 ->the KRT.I type the KRT of 10.1.1.4 below: ->DEST Gateway Genmask Flags ->Metric Ref Use Iface ->10.1.1.3 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 UGH ->0 0 0 eth1 ->10.1.1.2 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.255 UGH ->0 0 0 eth1 ->127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 ->U 0 0 0 lo ->default * 0.0.0.0 ->U 0 0 0 tun -> -> The network topology is shown below: -> 10.1.1.4 <----------->10.1.1.2 <----------------> ->10.1.1.3 -> -> Well, my problem is although the AODV works fine, but my data is not=20 ->transmitted as it should be. When I PING 10.1.1.3 from 10.1.1.4. I can ->saw the KRT updated but there wasn't any reply received at 10.1.1.4. I ->doubt it's due to the system configuration since routing table is=20 ->correct. -> -> I'm using RedHat 8.0 (kernel 2.4.18-14). Can u kindly tell me what=20 ->system configuration I should use to overcome the problem? -> -> Thank you for your kind help -> --=20 |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-07-20 05:42:44
|
There are too many things in a "system configuration: to just "kindly tell". As a first guess, I would suspect you have turned on a firewall (iptables) which is eating up all the ping packets. Can you ssh. -vikas On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Luo Yang wrote: ->Dear all: -> During last few weeks I was trying to setup AODV-UIUC on 2 ->notebooks and 1 desktop. So far: ->* The ASL-a-0.5, AODV-UIUC-0.5 are successfully compiled/installed ->* each node able to find neighbours using HELLO and KRT updated ->* When I tried to PING a unknown node(10.1.1.3) from node ->10.1.1.4, the AODV program worked well, adding route to the node in the ->KRT.I type the KRT of 10.1.1.4 below: ->DEST Gateway Genmask Flags ->Metric Ref Use Iface ->10.1.1.3 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 UGH ->0 0 0 eth1 ->10.1.1.2 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.255 UGH ->0 0 0 eth1 ->127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 ->U 0 0 0 lo ->default * 0.0.0.0 ->U 0 0 0 tun -> -> The network topology is shown below: -> 10.1.1.4 <----------->10.1.1.2 <----------------> ->10.1.1.3 -> -> Well, my problem is although the AODV works fine, but my data is ->not transmitted as it should be. When I PING 10.1.1.3 from 10.1.1.4. I ->can saw the KRT updated but there wasn't any reply received at 10.1.1.4. ->I doubt it's due to the system configuration since routing table is ->correct. -> -> I'm using RedHat 8.0 (kernel 2.4.18-14). Can u kindly tell me ->what system configuration I should use to overcome the problem? -> -> Thank you for your kind help -> -- |
From: Luo Y. <EY...@nt...> - 2004-07-20 05:31:57
|
> Dear all: > During last few weeks I was trying to setup AODV-UIUC on 2 > notebooks and 1 desktop. So far: > * The ASL-a-0.5, AODV-UIUC-0.5 are successfully compiled/installed > * each node able to find neighbours using HELLO and KRT updated > * When I tried to PING a unknown node(10.1.1.3) from node > 10.1.1.4, the AODV program worked well, adding route to the node in > the KRT.I type the KRT of 10.1.1.4 below: > DEST Gateway Genmask Flags > Metric Ref Use Iface > 10.1.1.3 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 UGH > 0 0 0 eth1 > 10.1.1.2 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.255 UGH > 0 0 0 eth1 > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 > U 0 0 0 lo > default * 0.0.0.0 > U 0 0 0 tun >=20 > The network topology is shown below: > 10.1.1.4 <----------->10.1.1.2 <----------------> > 10.1.1.3 >=20 > Well, my problem is although the AODV works fine, but my data is not > transmitted as it should be. When I PING 10.1.1.3 from 10.1.1.4. I can > saw the KRT updated but there wasn't any reply received at 10.1.1.4. I > doubt it's due to the system configuration since routing table is > correct. >=20 > I'm using RedHat 8.0 (kernel 2.4.18-14). Can u kindly tell me what > system configuration I should use to overcome the problem? >=20 > Thank you for your kind help |
From: Luo Y. <EY...@nt...> - 2004-07-20 05:24:08
|
Dear all: During last few weeks I was trying to setup AODV-UIUC on 2 notebooks and 1 desktop. So far: * The ASL-a-0.5, AODV-UIUC-0.5 are successfully compiled/installed * each node able to find neighbours using HELLO and KRT updated * When I tried to PING a unknown node(10.1.1.3) from node 10.1.1.4, the AODV program worked well, adding route to the node in the KRT.I type the KRT of 10.1.1.4 below: DEST Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 10.1.1.3 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth1 10.1.1.2 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth1 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 tun The network topology is shown below: 10.1.1.4 <----------->10.1.1.2 <----------------> 10.1.1.3 Well, my problem is although the AODV works fine, but my data is not transmitted as it should be. When I PING 10.1.1.3 from 10.1.1.4. I can saw the KRT updated but there wasn't any reply received at 10.1.1.4. I doubt it's due to the system configuration since routing table is correct. I'm using RedHat 8.0 (kernel 2.4.18-14). Can u kindly tell me what system configuration I should use to overcome the problem? Thank you for your kind help |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-07-19 10:28:16
|
Hi, No. As of now it will not. Some porting will be needed. -vikas On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 hi...@zi... wrote: ->Hi, -> My question is very simple. ->Will the AsLib work with IPv6 addresses? -> ->Thanks, -> Andrew. -> -> -> ->------------------------------------------------- ->This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ -> -> ->------------------------------------------------------- ->This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop ->FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! ->Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. ->http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click ->_______________________________________________ ->aslib-users mailing list ->asl...@li... ->https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aslib-users -> -- |
From: <hi...@zi...> - 2004-07-19 09:49:36
|
Hi, My question is very simple. Will the AsLib work with IPv6 addresses? Thanks, Andrew. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-04-26 00:36:09
|
The route_check modules in ASL-a-0.5 is actually for aodv and is the same as aodv-helper. The simple route-check is in ASL-0.11. The definition of output_filter is unnecessary code, it is not needed at all. I will correc= t it. route-check actually needs only one hook, and that is at the NF_IP_POST_ROUTING. It is very different from kernel-AODV. kernel-AODV is doing all the forwarding in the kernel module, hence bypassing the kernel routing table completely. ASL lets the kernel do the forwarding, and routing is in user-space. route_check is simply to log the usage times of the routes, hence it does not need all the hooks which kernel-aodv needs. If you have not already done so, please look at the MOBISYS paper on=20 http://aslib.sourceforge.net I will also try to find out if the MS thesis you mention can be made available. -vikas On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, =CE=E2=C9=D9=B4=A8 wrote: ->I'm studying ASL-a-0.5 and AODV-UIUC-0.5 now.But I can't find ->aodv-helper.Of course,you referred that we can work well with ->route_check.But I find that kernel moduler with some mistake,such as yo= u ->define a "input_filter" but you use it as NF_IP_POST_ROUTING. On the ->other hand, you define another hook output_filter without any initiatio= n ->before register it so it cause my compuer to halt.=20 I had read ->kernel-AODV that uses three hooks named NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING, NF_IP_FORWAR= D ->and NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT. But I can't understand your AODV-UIUC how to work ->without NF_IP_FORWARD and NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT. Could you tell me some ->details? I'm eager for a Master's thesis named Design, implementation ->and testing of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc network which you ->preferred in your paper but i can't find it. Thanks a lot. -> -> --=20 --=20 |
From: Dhaval M. <dha...@ya...> - 2004-04-23 18:58:53
|
Hi Vikas, I am running into a weird problem running AODV: I currently have 2 laptops set up in ad hoc mode running AODV. I start up aodvd on one of them and I can see that it is sending out hello packets approx every second. Then I start aodvd on the 2nd laptop. Both receive one hello packet sent by the other one, and then both of them go into this mode where they are both sending hello packets, but aren't receiving any. When I do a netstat -ul, I see that the aodv port is open and that the receive queue is increasing. That means that though both actually receive the hello packets sent on the socket/port, the code that is supposed to receive those packets isn't getting called, and hence the packets remain in the receive buffer of the OS. I don't know if you've ever seen this before or not, but any insight would be helpful. Thanks, Dhaval --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢ |
From: Dan L. <da...@st...> - 2004-04-16 22:09:05
|
Hi Jeff, I had this problem when I first started using libASL too. Removing `locate libgcc.a` in the route_check Makefile solved the problem for me. Try that. Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeffrey D'Amelia To: asl...@li... Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 5:26 PM Subject: [ASL] Cross-compile question Has anyone been successful in cross-compiling the aslib library and router_check kernel module for an arm processor. I am having trouble getting the route_check module to work. I can cross-compile it fine, but when I try to load it on my arm device, I get the following error: route_check.o: unresolved symbol _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ I have tired both 2.95.3 and 3.3.1...Can anyone help me out with this problem? Thanks! |
From: Jeffrey D'A. <jda...@as...> - 2004-04-16 21:27:31
|
Has anyone been successful in cross-compiling the aslib library and router_check kernel module for an arm processor. I am having trouble getting the route_check module to work. I can cross-compile it fine, but when I try to load it on my arm device, I get the following error: route_check.o: unresolved symbol _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ I have tired both 2.95.3 and 3.3.1...Can anyone help me out with this problem? Thanks! |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-04-04 03:39:43
|
I spent the last few hours trying to debug route_check.o, and in the process managed to irrepairably corrupt my filesystem. Before that I could discover that the problem is essentially due to redefinition of some netfilter symbols in newer kernel. Hence there are unresolved symbols and null pointer dereferencing. route_check.o works for stock 2.4.18 downloaded off http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ After some effort it could be made to work with later kernels. But then it may not work with 2.4.18. In general it appears messy to keep the module uptodate with kernel versions. I now believe that ASL should do away with route_check.o and become truly and completely a userspace library. Let me present my case. route_check.o is there to duplicate route caching information which the kernel already maintains but does not output to /proc/net/rt_cache. route_check.o was written since we did not want to change the kernel source AT ALL. See section 4.1.2 of the paper: http://aslib.sourceforge.net/papers/HTML-paper-327/index.html It turns out there is another way to get the last_use_time out of the kernel, and that is through a NETLINK socket. The popular tool iproute2 does that. For example try the command: ip -s -s route list cache What we want is the "age field". The information is there in the output, we could put it to a file and grep it or something. But thats ugly. So what ASL really should do is open a netlink socket to the kernel and read this route cache information. This would have to be done in the function query_route_idle_time() in libASL/api.c. This is in essence a replication of part of what iproute2 does. The source of iproute2 is here: (http://www-courses.cs.uiuc.edu/~cs397hou/iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz) The relevant function is rtnl_rtcache_request(struct rtnl_handle *rth, int family) in ip/iproute.c and the file lib/libnetlink.c. So one needs to carefully look into these two files and incorporate that functionality in query_route_idle_time(). Effect on AODV. -------------- AODV uses route_check.o in a more complicated way through the function query_route_idle_time_aodv(addr_t k, int destination_flag) defined in ASL-a. This is to support a seemingly redundant subte optimization, see section 5.1.3 of the above paper. We could do away with it at the risk of not completely complying with the AODV draft. In anycase, query_route_idle_time_aodv() can also be modified to use all the information it needs from the kernel cache. I have outlined my thoughts and possible options. I would appreciate input from the list. The changes I propose are straightforward but tedious. Rolling out a well tested new version may be 3-4 days of hard work. Unfortunately I am really caught up in other work, and cant afford to do this for another 2 weeks or so at least. In the unlikely event that someone on the list feels motivated, I would be glad to help. Inputs on the proposed changes are appreciated anyways. Thanks -vikas |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-04-04 03:39:43
|
I dont have a redhat 8 system now, but I downloaded the kernel from this site and this one works. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.18.tar.bz2 I am debugging the module for higher kernels, right now. -vikas On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: ->It is 2.4.18-14 (redhat 8). -> ->Vikas Kawadia <ka...@co...> wrote: ->What is your kernel version. ->At this point ASL work with at most 2.4.18. ->-vikas -> ->On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: -> ->->Hi Vikas, ->-> ->->I have redhat 8. The versions are as follows: ->->gcc - 3.2 ->->autoconf - 2.53 ->->automake - 1.6.3 ->-> ->->I compiled it and it worked this time around (it didn't give me any such errors). ->-> ->->But now, after making aodvd when i try to insert route_check.o it freezes. It insmod'ed route_check.o BEFORE I made aodvd. ->-> ->->I'm clueless as to why it's behaving like this. ->-> ->->I'd appreciate it if you could please look into this. ->-> ->->Thanks a bunch, ->->Dhaval ->-> ->-> ->-> ->-> ->->Vikas Kawadia wrote: ->-> ->->I have'nt seen this before. Looks like some update in the autoconf set of ->->tools enforcing certain rules which were just guidelines earlier.. Can you ->->tell me what distribution of linux you are using, and also the version of ->->gcc and autoconf and automake. ->-> ->->Also, what happens if you ignore the error and proceed with compilation. ->-> ->->-vikas ->-> ->-> ->->On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: ->-> ->->->Hi Vikas, ->->-> ->->->I am trying to install ASL, and while making it I get the error: ->->-> ->->->configure.in:56: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly, use AC_LIBOBJ (see section ->->->`AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS' ->->->make: *** [configure] Error 1 ->->-> ->->->Could you please tell me what I need to do to fix this? ->->-> ->->->Thanks, ->->->Dhaval ->->-> ->->-> ->->->__________________________________ ->->->Do you Yahoo!? ->->->Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway ->->->http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ ->->-> ->->-> ->->->------------------------------------------------------- ->->->This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials ->->->Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of ->->->GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system ->->->administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ->->->_______________________________________________ ->->->aslib-users mailing list ->->->asl...@li... ->->->https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aslib-users ->->-> ->-> ->-> -> -> -- |
From: Dhaval M. <dha...@ya...> - 2004-04-03 22:56:27
|
It is 2.4.18-14 (redhat 8). Vikas Kawadia <ka...@co...> wrote: What is your kernel version. At this point ASL work with at most 2.4.18. -vikas On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: ->Hi Vikas, -> ->I have redhat 8. The versions are as follows: ->gcc - 3.2 ->autoconf - 2.53 ->automake - 1.6.3 -> ->I compiled it and it worked this time around (it didn't give me any such errors). -> ->But now, after making aodvd when i try to insert route_check.o it freezes. It insmod'ed route_check.o BEFORE I made aodvd. -> ->I'm clueless as to why it's behaving like this. -> ->I'd appreciate it if you could please look into this. -> ->Thanks a bunch, ->Dhaval -> -> -> -> ->Vikas Kawadia wrote: -> ->I have'nt seen this before. Looks like some update in the autoconf set of ->tools enforcing certain rules which were just guidelines earlier.. Can you ->tell me what distribution of linux you are using, and also the version of ->gcc and autoconf and automake. -> ->Also, what happens if you ignore the error and proceed with compilation. -> ->-vikas -> -> ->On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: -> ->->Hi Vikas, ->-> ->->I am trying to install ASL, and while making it I get the error: ->-> ->->configure.in:56: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly, use AC_LIBOBJ (see section ->->`AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS' ->->make: *** [configure] Error 1 ->-> ->->Could you please tell me what I need to do to fix this? ->-> ->->Thanks, ->->Dhaval ->-> ->-> ->->__________________________________ ->->Do you Yahoo!? ->->Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway ->->http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ ->-> ->-> ->->------------------------------------------------------- ->->This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials ->->Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of ->->GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system ->->administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ->->_______________________________________________ ->->aslib-users mailing list ->->asl...@li... ->->https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aslib-users ->-> -> -> -- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ aslib-users mailing list asl...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aslib-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway - Enter today |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-04-03 21:05:57
|
What is your kernel version. At this point ASL work with at most 2.4.18. -vikas On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: ->Hi Vikas, -> ->I have redhat 8. The versions are as follows: ->gcc - 3.2 ->autoconf - 2.53 ->automake - 1.6.3 -> ->I compiled it and it worked this time around (it didn't give me any such errors). -> ->But now, after making aodvd when i try to insert route_check.o it freezes. It insmod'ed route_check.o BEFORE I made aodvd. -> ->I'm clueless as to why it's behaving like this. -> ->I'd appreciate it if you could please look into this. -> ->Thanks a bunch, ->Dhaval -> -> -> -> ->Vikas Kawadia <ka...@co...> wrote: -> ->I have'nt seen this before. Looks like some update in the autoconf set of ->tools enforcing certain rules which were just guidelines earlier.. Can you ->tell me what distribution of linux you are using, and also the version of ->gcc and autoconf and automake. -> ->Also, what happens if you ignore the error and proceed with compilation. -> ->-vikas -> -> ->On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: -> ->->Hi Vikas, ->-> ->->I am trying to install ASL, and while making it I get the error: ->-> ->->configure.in:56: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly, use AC_LIBOBJ (see section ->->`AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS' ->->make: *** [configure] Error 1 ->-> ->->Could you please tell me what I need to do to fix this? ->-> ->->Thanks, ->->Dhaval ->-> ->-> ->->__________________________________ ->->Do you Yahoo!? ->->Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway ->->http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ ->-> ->-> ->->------------------------------------------------------- ->->This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials ->->Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of ->->GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system ->->administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ->->_______________________________________________ ->->aslib-users mailing list ->->asl...@li... ->->https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aslib-users ->-> -> -> -- |
From: Dhaval M. <dha...@ya...> - 2004-04-03 21:00:17
|
Hi Vikas, I have redhat 8. The versions are as follows: gcc - 3.2 autoconf - 2.53 automake - 1.6.3 I compiled it and it worked this time around (it didn't give me any such errors). But now, after making aodvd when i try to insert route_check.o it freezes. It insmod'ed route_check.o BEFORE I made aodvd. I'm clueless as to why it's behaving like this. I'd appreciate it if you could please look into this. Thanks a bunch, Dhaval Vikas Kawadia <ka...@co...> wrote: I have'nt seen this before. Looks like some update in the autoconf set of tools enforcing certain rules which were just guidelines earlier.. Can you tell me what distribution of linux you are using, and also the version of gcc and autoconf and automake. Also, what happens if you ignore the error and proceed with compilation. -vikas On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: ->Hi Vikas, -> ->I am trying to install ASL, and while making it I get the error: -> ->configure.in:56: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly, use AC_LIBOBJ (see section ->`AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS' ->make: *** [configure] Error 1 -> ->Could you please tell me what I need to do to fix this? -> ->Thanks, ->Dhaval -> -> ->__________________________________ ->Do you Yahoo!? ->Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway ->http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ -> -> ->------------------------------------------------------- ->This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials ->Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of ->GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system ->administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ->_______________________________________________ ->aslib-users mailing list ->asl...@li... ->https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aslib-users -> -- --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway - Enter today |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-04-03 06:27:54
|
I have'nt seen this before. Looks like some update in the autoconf set of tools enforcing certain rules which were just guidelines earlier.. Can you tell me what distribution of linux you are using, and also the version of gcc and autoconf and automake. Also, what happens if you ignore the error and proceed with compilation. -vikas On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: ->Hi Vikas, -> ->I am trying to install ASL, and while making it I get the error: -> ->configure.in:56: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly, use AC_LIBOBJ (see section ->`AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS' ->make: *** [configure] Error 1 -> ->Could you please tell me what I need to do to fix this? -> ->Thanks, ->Dhaval -> -> ->__________________________________ ->Do you Yahoo!? ->Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway ->http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ -> -> ->------------------------------------------------------- ->This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials ->Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of ->GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system ->administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ->_______________________________________________ ->aslib-users mailing list ->asl...@li... ->https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aslib-users -> -- |
From: Dhaval M. <dha...@ya...> - 2004-04-02 18:03:46
|
Hi Vikas, I am trying to install ASL, and while making it I get the error: configure.in:56: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly, use AC_LIBOBJ (see section `AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS' make: *** [configure] Error 1 Could you please tell me what I need to do to fix this? Thanks, Dhaval __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ |
From: Vikas K. <ka...@co...> - 2004-03-28 04:50:59
|
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Dhaval Mehta wrote: ->Hi all, -> I am facing the same problem as what Armen was facing in the post ->"AODV-UIUC manual?". Armen, were you able to figure out the cause? If you are talking about the error in select: "Interrupted System call", it is normal. It occurs because signals, in this case SIGALRM, cause select to break, and it returns -1. We simple call select again, and its not a problem. One could use pselect() to mask certain signals but often those signals are necessary and cannot be masked. -> Also, do you guys know if route_check.o now works with kernels > ->2.4.19? Or do we still need to use 2.4.18? -> It still works with versions up to 2.4.18 only. I have'nt spent too much time on it, but could'nt figure out what has changed in 2.4.19 thats causing a panic. I'll have to use uml to complete the debugging.. -vikas |
From: Armen B. <ar...@cs...> - 2004-03-27 20:04:38
|
Hi Dhaval, It's been a very long time since I've looked at my ad-hoc stuff...so I=20= don't recall exactly what the problem was. But looking at the source code in aodv.cc, the call to select() does=20 not seem correct. select() needs a struct timeval * as its last=20 argument, so I think you should declare a struct timeval timeout , and=20= initialize the timeout.tv_sec and timeout.tv_usec fields of, and then=20 pass this pointer to this to select(). The existing aodv.cc just=20 passes a NULL pointer, which select() might be complaining about (and=20 thus returning < 0). That may be the problem. Let me (or this list) know. When I get back=20 into this work, I'll look at it some more. I also plan to take a crack at figuring out why route_check doesn't=20 want to work in kernels > 2.4.18, now that I've been learning a bit=20 about linux kernel internals. Ah, the todo list keeps getting bigger.=20= :) Hope this helps, - Armen On Mar 27, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Dhaval Mehta wrote: > Hi all, > =A0 > I am facing the same problem as what Armen was facing in the post=20 > "AODV-UIUC manual?".=A0 Armen, were you able to figure out the cause? > =A0 > Also, do you guys know if=A0route_check.o now works with kernels >=20 > 2.4.19?=A0=A0Or do we still need to use 2.4.18? > =A0 > Thanks in advance, > Dhaval=A0 > > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. |