Re: [asio-users] [ANN] emilua-beast 1.0

[Vinnie F. <vin...@gm...>]

On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 4:33 AM Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
<vin...@gm...> wrote:
> Boost.Beast C++ API is different. Would this choice be acceptable for Lua bindings even if it deviates from the C++ API?

In short, yes it is acceptable. Adding fields to a client handshake is
a common operation, and there is no reason not to have this API. We
could in theory add it to Beast, someone just needs to open an issue.
However, your implementation is also OK.

Thanks