Re: [asio-users] [ANN] emilua-beast 1.0

[Vinícius d. S. O. <vin...@gm...>]

Here's what I had in mind for the client role:
https://gitlab.com/emilua/beast/-/commit/4c7059cea27a65fbf302fa9a866932563a09de2f

In retrospect, my previous email wasn't very clear in this part. So I
decided to just commit some code to show what I had in mind. Now you can
use Lua code such as the following to insert extra headers in the client
handshake:

ws:handshake(host, '/ws/api/v2', { origin = host })

Boost.Beast C++ API is different. Would this choice be acceptable for Lua
bindings even if it deviates from the C++ API? That's what I was trying to
ask. If it's okay, I can tag a new release with this code and release a new
ArchLinux package.


-- 
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
https://vinipsmaker.github.io/