|
From: Sam C. <sa...@su...> - 2002-05-15 22:00:03
|
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:19:43PM +0000, Pablo Baena wrote: > Please consider calling the library something like libpcmresample or > libpcmmixer, for libpcmsample doesn't say much, much less libsample. I think 'libpcm' is OK as long as we only want to support PCM audio (which looks unlikely). Otherwise I think 'libresample' is actually better than 'libsample'. I=20 would suggest 'libresample' and drop the mixing and scaling code. =20 Mixing/scaling is fairly trivial has little to do with resampling and=20 far fewer uses IMHO. sam --=20 sam clegg :: sa...@su... :: http://superduper.net/=20 :: PGP :: D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.4 2002/04/27 11:54:02 samc Exp $ |