|
From: Sam C. <sa...@su...> - 2002-05-15 17:52:33
|
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:34:53PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > In fact, perhaps we should rename the library to 'libpcm'. >=20 > This is a good idea.=20 >=20 > What is the exact definition of "pulse code modulation"? Do uLaw and > aLaw fall under this notion? If this is not the case, libpcm might not > be the ideal name. Well, technically PCM is a simple linear scale and ulaw and alaw are non-linear. Do we need to support ulaw and alaw? If so libpcm is not correct. ulaw and alaw don't show up much these days. > However, the project at sf.net is already called libsample. Is it > possible to rename a project at sf.net? maybe by mailing the sf.net > staff? I'm sure it can be changed, or a least removed and then the new one created. --=20 sam clegg :: sa...@su... :: http://superduper.net/=20 :: PGP :: D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.4 2002/04/27 11:54:02 samc Exp $ |