Re: [Arsperl-users] upcoming release - proposed 1.94

[Paul B. <pbl...@gm...>]

Speaking on behalf of the peanut gallery, I'd say 64bit support alone is
worthy of a 2.00 designation.  Throw in that 4.5 legacy is going away and
it's a pretty strong case.

On Thu, May 21, 2015, 7:52 PM jeff murphy <jcm...@je...> wrote:

> I generally follow semver on my projects (i was the one who mentioned it
> to Tim). CPAN doesnt like the second doc, so I used a loose interpretation
> of semver for perl projects. maj.min where maj denotes “things will break”
> and min denotes “things wont break”. for a while i did eg 1.6000 .. but
> that didnt last ;)
>
> that being said, i dont have a strong pref in this case. we’re so close to
> 1.99 (and so running out of minors..) that i dont mind going to 2.0.
> whatever ppl want.. i’ll be out of town from noon tomorrow (eastern) until
> the 31st.. so decide in the next 13 hours! or the cpan push will have to
> wait until i get back..
>
>
>
>
> jeff
>
> > On May 21, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Michiel Beijen <mic...@gm...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Tim Lank <ti...@ti...> wrote:
> >> 1.94 - will be packaged in the next couple of days and arrive on both
> CPAN
> >> and SourceForge
> >>
> >> Proposed Change Log:
> >
> > ==< snip >==
> >
> >> - dropped support to compile ARSperl using ARAPI below version 4.5
> >>
> >> - small bugfixes
> >>
> >> am I missing anything above?
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any issues with the version being called 1.94 as per
> >> http://semver.org?
> >
> >
> > Well, first of all, ARSperl never stated that is uses semantic
> > versioning AFAIK; and semantic versioning means it would use a x.y.z
> > style and not the x.y style which ARSperl uses.
> > Also, CPAN does not handle semantic versioning well; it basically only
> > handles numbers or versions such as 1.94, 1.95 properly, if you'd
> > introduce a second dot things will start breaking.
> >
> > And dropping ARAPI below 4.5 REALLY would not be a breaking thing as
> > 4.5 was released I think in 2002 or earlier; also older versions of
> > the ARSperl package are still available, and people can even connect
> > to such old Remedy systems using 5, 6 or 7.x client libraries.
> >
> > If the ARSPerl module is all polished up it might be a nice time to
> > "up" the version number to 2.00.
> > --
> > Michiel
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> > Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> > Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> >
> >
> > --
> > Arsperl-users mailing list
> > Ars...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
>
> --
> Arsperl-users mailing list
> Ars...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-users