From: Simo S. <sim...@ti...> - 2001-02-10 01:24:20
|
Giovanni Corriga wrote: > > On 09 Feb 2001 15:42:05 +0100, Hongli Lai wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Feb 2001 15:11:53 Giovanni Corriga wrote: > > > I'm quite not satisfied by the way the info about the archive content is > > > manipulated (a GList holding a fileinfo struct). I was thinking to > > > replace it with a custom list (a FiList) derived from the standard > > > GList. > > > I have written some code for you to review. Please note that I haven't > > > even tried to compile it. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > I don't see why it is neccesary. > > > > Just good OOP. It is not really necessary - just an itch that needs to > be scratched. ;-) > I've not seen any difference or advancement against a standard GList, what's the point? You may add a function to misc if you want other manipulation function above the standard provided one. Can you explain exactly where your implementation has it's strenght and why it so better than standard Glist (Isn't Filist a simple typedef? I've not seen a different structure) -- sim...@ti... http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/9757 |