From: Daniel W. <da...@wh...> - 2008-08-17 00:52:54
|
Looks like the changes in 11286 and 11284 have been overshadowed by a change in the line endings from cr to crlf. -- Daniel White |
From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX - 2008-08-17 07:47:08
|
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Daniel White <da...@wh...> wrote: > Looks like the changes in 11286 and 11284 have been overshadowed by a > change in the line endings from cr to crlf. Ouch! I'll make sure the properties on the files get set correctly in order to prevent this mistake in the future. Bye, Erik. |
From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX - 2008-08-20 21:25:13
|
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:47 AM, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Daniel White <da...@wh...> wrote: >> Looks like the changes in 11286 and 11284 have been overshadowed by a >> change in the line endings from cr to crlf. > > Ouch! I'll make sure the properties on the files get set correctly in > order to prevent this mistake in the future. BTW: I'm sure (although I can't remember which) Subversion has an option to ignore line-ending changes when diffing 2 versions. I'm trying to get a commit through my dial-up pipe to SF to set the appropriate value for svn:eol-style before I do further commits: I haven't been able to convince my editory to leave the line endings alone. Bye, Erik. |
From: Ville V. <vil...@gm...> - 2008-08-20 21:36:47
|
> BTW: I'm sure (although I can't remember which) Subversion has an > option to ignore line-ending changes when diffing 2 versions. svn diff -x --ignore-eol-style? |
From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX - 2008-08-20 22:16:37
|
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:25 PM, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:47 AM, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Daniel White <da...@wh...> wrote: >>> Looks like the changes in 11286 and 11284 have been overshadowed by a >>> change in the line endings from cr to crlf. >> >> Ouch! I'll make sure the properties on the files get set correctly in >> order to prevent this mistake in the future. > > BTW: I'm sure (although I can't remember which) Subversion has an > option to ignore line-ending changes when diffing 2 versions. > > I'm trying to get a commit through my dial-up pipe to SF to set the > appropriate value for svn:eol-style before I do further commits: I > haven't been able to convince my editory to leave the line endings > alone. At the agonizing slow pace of 75 minutes for 800 files of which only 3 have content changes.... It's done. Bye, Erik. |