From: Erik <eri...@ho...> - 2004-06-30 07:43:02
|
Hi, You have a nice collection of links to infrastructure tools for system administration at: http://ark.sourceforge.net/related.html I would be very glad if you included a link to http://xml2hostconf.sourceforge.net A description could for instance be: xml2hostconf is a collection of xslt scripts that generate rpm packages, dhcpd.conf, grub files, kickstart files and html documentation. A system administrator of a redhat linux network can specify the setup of all the computers in a single xml file. Each computer will be given its own "virtual" rpm package. The generated rpm packages might have dependencies and they might also contain configuration files. I did a comparison between xml2hostconf and ark on http://xml2hostconf.sourceforge.net/links.html <snip> Ark provides a framework for collaborative system administration of multi-platform Unix sites with many dozens of machines. xml2hostconf just delivers host configuration files to the clients by means of generated rpm packages. Ark on the other hand delivers whole packages ( binaries + configuration files ) to the client by means of compilation from source code. Ark can therefore be used as a layer above many different unix variants. xml2hostconf is limited to only redhat linux distributions. Like xml2hostconf do, Ark also uses xml files as configuration format. xml2hostconf can use its own configuration files to generate html documentation. I didn't see that feature in Ark. Ark has a bigger scope and tries to solve more things than xml2hostconf, but on the other hand seems more complex. It has roughly 7 times as many lines of source code than xml2hostconf. License: GPL. Programming language: Python </snip> Do you find it a fair comparison? Did I understand Ark correctly? cheers, Erik Sjölund |