Re: non-gcc dependency flags

[Will P. <pa...@dc...>]

Edward Moy writes:

> However, I would thing that fixing the "busted
> dependencyFlags" would be a useful future enhancement,
> particularly given the variety of unices out there.

I agree that the present deal is a wart/hack and should be
fixed.  (Not exactly sure when I'll get to it but...)

The simplest thing would be to pass dependencyFlags a
"compiler style" parameter, 'gcc' being one possible value.
Add more as needed.  Means that dependencyFlags becomes More
Horrible, but at least it's in one place.

Anyone care to object/barf :-?

Will