Re: [Archive-access-discuss] wayback Calendar jsp

[Bradley T. <br...@ar...>]

That's correct, thanks Mac!

More specifically, the '*' indicates that the SHA1 digest of the HTTP 
body (the HTTP response not including the HTTP headers) changed between 
versions.

Brad

On 5/24/11 9:01 AM, Mac...@nb... wrote:
>
> Hi Pramila,
>
> In the classic version of the wayback-machine it said: " * denotes 
> when site was updated".
>
> Example: 
> http://classic-web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.gemeinde-bauen.ch 
> <http://classic-web.archive.org/web/*/http:/www.gemeinde-bauen.ch>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Mac
>
> *Mac Kobus
> *Digitale Archivierung ¦ e-Helvetica
>
> Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI
> Bundesamt für Kultur BAK
> Schweizerische Nationalbibliothek NB
>
> Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern
>
> tel +41 31 322 89 93
> fax +41 31 322 84 63
> mac...@nb... <mailto:mac...@nb...>
> www.nb.admin.ch <http://www.nb.admin.ch> ¦ 
> http://www.nb.admin.ch/e-helvetica
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Von:*Pra...@on... [mailto:Pra...@on...]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 24. Mai 2011 17:15
> *An:* arc...@li...
> *Betreff:* [Archive-access-discuss] wayback Calendar jsp
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Can someone clarify this for me please? In the Calendar.jsp , 
> sometimes it shows that the site has been crawled with links.
>
> Some of the links have star besides them and some don't. What is the 
> difference between them?
>
> Here is the screen shot that I am talking about.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Pramila Thakur
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*Graham, Laura [mailto:lg...@lo...]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:45 AM
> *To:* 'arc...@li...'
> *Subject:* [Archive-access-discuss] Problem displaying revisit records 
> in wayback-1.4.2 due to indexer?
>
> Hi,
>
> From what we can tell, in order to display warc revisit records in 
> wayback 1.4.2, the warcs have to be indexed with the warc-indexer from 
> 1.4.0.
>
> Cdx files indexed with wayback 1.4.2 warc-indexer have a 
> "warc/revisit" field that wayback 1.4.2 cannot display. We just got a 
> blank screen.
>
> After doing some research, we discovered that if we index the warcs 
> with the wayback 1.4.0 warc-indexer, the same revisit records do 
> display in 1.4.2.  The resulting cdx does NOT have the warc/revisit 
> field.
>
> It's quite possible we're missing something,  but could it be that 
> 1.4.2 warc indexer was updated but not the wayback itself?  We have 
> found that 1.6.0 can display the 1.4.2 warc/revisit cdx's.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Laura Graham
>
> Library of Congress
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archive-access-discuss mailing list
> Arc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/archive-access-discuss