RE: [Arch4j-developers] ARCH4J JMS

[RefuX Z. <re...@ya...>]

I was just thinking it could be a helpful housekeeping
feature. Kinda like how we close resultsets,
connections etc..




--- David Colwell <dco...@sp...> wrote:
> You hit it - the idea was that the queue facade
> could be long lived, but
> many senders may come and go.  In the spirit of
> releasing resources as soon
> as possible, the interface was made as such.
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RefuX Zanzebarr
> To: arc...@li...
> Sent: 4/26/02 4:35 PM
> Subject: [Arch4j-developers] ARCH4J JMS
> 
> I looking at the ARCH4J MessageQueueFacade JavaDoc's
> example code:
> 
> --- snip ---
> 
> MessageQueueFacade qFacade =
>
MessagingProvider.getProvider().getMessageQueueFacade(false);
> 
> 
> QueueSender sender =
> qFacade.createQueueSender("exampleQueue"); 
> 
> qFacade.startConnection(); 
> 
> TextMessage message = qFacade.createTextMessage(new
> StringBuffer("Hello Whirled")); 
> 
> sender.send(message); 
> 
> sender.close(); 
> 
> qFacade.close();
> 
> --- snip ---
> 
> and was thinking, why don't we just do the
> 'sender.close()' in qFacade.close() ?
> I understand there could be multiple QueueSenders
> within the scope of one QueueFacade instance, but
> there's no reason why we couldn't track them all and
> just close them all (if they're not already closed)
> automagically on qFacade.close()
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
> http://games.yahoo.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Arch4j-developers mailing list
> Arc...@li...
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arch4j-developers
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com