From: Antoni M. <ant...@gm...> - 2008-12-09 10:18:42
|
2008/12/9 Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes <gun...@df...>: > Hi Aperturers, > > One thing to all this - even if smile requires the micro-bundle > approach, let us not forget the lesson learned from sesame where at > least everyone I know still uses the one-jar. So lets make sure than > while this is being refactored, we still have some way of building it > the old way (or the "usable" way :) Fear not. The microbundles scenario, as described by smila folks - 45 bundles for aperture and 90 bundles for each and every aperture dependency doesn't look appealing to me either. -- Antoni Myłka ant...@gm... |