Re: [Apc-aa-coders] Switch in site

[Honza M. <hon...@ec...>]

On P=E1, 2003-01-03 at 03:11, Mitra wrote:
> I notice that in the site, it accepts the syntax
>=20
> switch(m)a:123:b:456
>=20
> For consistency, this should be
>=20
> switch({m})a:123:b:456
> just like
> switch({headline........})a:123:b:456
>=20
> Would you have a problem if the merged code used the consistent=20
> syntax, or does it need special-casing?

You are right - the syntax there should be switch({m}). There will not
be problem, if you add new syntax there.=20
If you drop the current one, we will have to change some spots in Ecn
site (and in Changenet site).

   Honza