apacheoo-deb-user Mailing List for Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository
The unofficial Apache OpenOffice Debian repository
Brought to you by:
msantana
Menu
▾
▴
apacheoo-deb-user — ApacheOO-deb user mailing list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Echedey L. R. <el...@di...> - 2021-10-12 17:38:44
|
Good afternoon from Spain, When trying to upgrade to the last Apache OpenOffice version (currently 4.1.11) I am receiving errors in APT telling me that there is a missmatch between the supposed package checksums and the ones I am downloading. This only happens with some packages and I report this today with the issue happening, at least, since yesterday when I was upgrading several tools in my system. As a security measure, I aborted the download of any package related to this repository until this situation is resolved as could mean that the repository could have been compromised. Thank you in advance. -- Regards, Echedey, Lopez Romero () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments |
|
From: Γιώργος Κ. <gio...@gm...> - 2018-11-15 13:41:54
|
Hi! :-) Is this project abandoned? It installs v.4.1.3, while the last one is 4.1.5. G. |
|
From: BRM <bm_...@ya...> - 2016-03-14 21:53:44
|
Must have been:Hit http://downloads.sourceforge.net testing InRelease Ign http://downloads.sourceforge.net testing/main Translation-en_US Get:36 http://downloads.sourceforge.net testing/main amd64 Packages [62.7 kB] Ign http://downloads.sourceforge.net testing/main Translation-en Didn't get an error this time round. I had tried it several times, so must have been the SF mirrors or something. Seems to be working nowThanks, Ben On Monday, March 14, 2016 2:35 PM, Marcelo Santana <ma...@ms...> wrote: On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:16:17 +0000 (UTC), BRM <bm_...@ya...> wrote: Hello Ben, > I did an update today and now I'm getting the following message with respect to the AOO-deb repository: > > W: Failed to fetch http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/apacheoo-deb/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/Packages Hash Sum mismatch > > Adding [arch=amd64] to the source.list entry changed it to the following: > > W: Failed to fetch http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/apacheoo-deb/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/Packages Hash Sum mismatch > > Is there a problem with the repository? I just did an "apt-get update" and I found no problem as you can see: $ sudo apt-get update Hit:1 http://security.debian.org testing/updates InRelease Hit:2 http://ufpr.dl.sourceforge.net/project/apacheoo-deb/debian testing InRelease Get:3 http://ftp.ccc.uba.ar/pub/linux/debian/debian testing InRelease [215 kB] Get:4 http://ftp.ccc.uba.ar/pub/linux/debian/debian unstable InRelease [287 kB] Get:5 http://ftp.ccc.uba.ar/pub/linux/debian/debian experimental InRelease [188 kB] Fetched 690 kB in 7s (92.4 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done Maybe it was some temporary unavailability on sourceforge server in your region. Try again and let me know if that problem continue occurring. Kind regard, -- Marcelo Santana (aka msantana) <ma...@ms...> http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana 4096R/5B76053D: 8E9B 1014 4019 3526 C1C6 B0AC A3C0 DA1E 5B76 053D ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Apacheoo-deb-user mailing list Apa...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apacheoo-deb-user |
|
From: Marcelo S. <ma...@ms...> - 2016-03-14 18:35:56
|
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:16:17 +0000 (UTC), BRM <bm_...@ya...> wrote: Hello Ben, > I did an update today and now I'm getting the following message with respect to the AOO-deb repository: > > W: Failed to fetch http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/apacheoo-deb/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/Packages Hash Sum mismatch > > Adding [arch=amd64] to the source.list entry changed it to the following: > > W: Failed to fetch http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/apacheoo-deb/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/Packages Hash Sum mismatch > > Is there a problem with the repository? I just did an "apt-get update" and I found no problem as you can see: $ sudo apt-get update Hit:1 http://security.debian.org testing/updates InRelease Hit:2 http://ufpr.dl.sourceforge.net/project/apacheoo-deb/debian testing InRelease Get:3 http://ftp.ccc.uba.ar/pub/linux/debian/debian testing InRelease [215 kB] Get:4 http://ftp.ccc.uba.ar/pub/linux/debian/debian unstable InRelease [287 kB] Get:5 http://ftp.ccc.uba.ar/pub/linux/debian/debian experimental InRelease [188 kB] Fetched 690 kB in 7s (92.4 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done Maybe it was some temporary unavailability on sourceforge server in your region. Try again and let me know if that problem continue occurring. Kind regard, -- Marcelo Santana (aka msantana) <ma...@ms...> http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana 4096R/5B76053D: 8E9B 1014 4019 3526 C1C6 B0AC A3C0 DA1E 5B76 053D |
|
From: BRM <bm_...@ya...> - 2016-03-14 15:16:27
|
I did an update today and now I'm getting the following message with respect to the AOO-deb repository: W: Failed to fetch http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/apacheoo-deb/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/Packages Hash Sum mismatch Adding [arch=amd64] to the source.list entry changed it to the following: W: Failed to fetch http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/apacheoo-deb/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/Packages Hash Sum mismatch Is there a problem with the repository? Thanks, Ben |
|
From: BRM <bm_...@ya...> - 2015-09-29 22:20:06
|
Thanks. I'll try to update tonight.
Ben
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:52 AM, Marcelo Santana <ma...@ms...> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:04:04 +0000 (UTC)
BRM <bm_...@ya...> wrote:
Hello Ben,
> I was looking at the README file provided at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian/; the date
> of which (as shown by SF.net) is older than the blog post (2014-08-25
> vs 2015-05-30) and shows the same PGP key (90127F5B); and no I didn't
> see that blog post, which is not in an obvious place to look.
Ok, I understood. I've just update the README file.
Let me know if you get any additional warning.
Regards,
--
Marcelo Santana
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Apacheoo-deb-user mailing list
Apa...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apacheoo-deb-user
|
|
From: Marcelo S. <ma...@ms...> - 2015-09-29 14:52:04
|
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:04:04 +0000 (UTC) BRM <bm_...@ya...> wrote: Hello Ben, > I was looking at the README file provided at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian/; the date > of which (as shown by SF.net) is older than the blog post (2014-08-25 > vs 2015-05-30) and shows the same PGP key (90127F5B); and no I didn't > see that blog post, which is not in an obvious place to look. Ok, I understood. I've just update the README file. Let me know if you get any additional warning. Regards, -- Marcelo Santana |
|
From: BRM <bm_...@ya...> - 2015-09-29 14:04:17
|
I was looking at the README file provided at http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian/; the date of which (as shown by SF.net) is older than the blog post (2014-08-25 vs 2015-05-30) and shows the same PGP key (90127F5B); and no I didn't see that blog post, which is not in an obvious place to look. Ben On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:02 AM, Marcelo Santana <ma...@ms...> wrote: On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:45:33 +0000 (UTC) BRM <bm_...@ya...> wrote: Hello Ben, > Did the GPG key change or did someone break in?The README was not > updated if it was changed, and I'm getting warnings about the GPG key > having expired. I see it was changed in May 2015; but I don't see the > README having been updated to reflect it either. Did you already read that blog post? http://sourceforge.net/p/apacheoo-deb/blog/2015/05/expiration-date-of-gnupg-key-updated/ Regards, -- Marcelo Santana ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Apacheoo-deb-user mailing list Apa...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apacheoo-deb-user |
|
From: Marcelo S. <ma...@ms...> - 2015-09-29 11:02:44
|
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:45:33 +0000 (UTC) BRM <bm_...@ya...> wrote: Hello Ben, > Did the GPG key change or did someone break in?The README was not > updated if it was changed, and I'm getting warnings about the GPG key > having expired. I see it was changed in May 2015; but I don't see the > README having been updated to reflect it either. Did you already read that blog post? http://sourceforge.net/p/apacheoo-deb/blog/2015/05/expiration-date-of-gnupg-key-updated/ Regards, -- Marcelo Santana |
|
From: BRM <bm_...@ya...> - 2015-09-29 05:45:40
|
Did the GPG key change or did someone break in?The README was not updated if it was changed, and I'm getting warnings about the GPG key having expired. I see it was changed in May 2015; but I don't see the README having been updated to reflect it either. Thanks, Ben |
|
From: Marcelo S. <mar...@ya...> - 2014-04-02 17:01:57
|
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:26:45 +0200 "Ian D. Samson" <ian...@gm...> wrote: Hi there, > Is there a 64-bit version of Apache OpenOffice? I found the > installation of the 4.1.0_beta 32-bit rather cumbersome. Sure. You can get all beta versions here: http://www.openoffice.org/download/all_beta.html Regards, Marcelo Santana |
|
From: Ian D. S. <ian...@gm...> - 2014-03-31 08:26:53
|
Is there a 64-bit version of Apache OpenOffice? I found the installation of the 4.1.0_beta 32-bit rather cumbersome. * Ian D. Samson <ian...@gm...>* Ian Samson Sound Studio <http://www.lp2cd.za.net/> *Managing Trustee*: Camelot Body Corporate <cam...@gm...>, Windsor West, 2194 [Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/ian.d.samson?ref=tn_tnmn> / Ntaba Mhlophe <https://www.facebook.com/Ntabamhlope.za?ref=hl>] Linux Mint<https://www.facebook.com/groups/linuxmintmembers/>(Admin) SA Weather Pictures <http://www.facebook.com/groups/ZAWeatherPics> & Nkosi sikelel i'Afrika <https://www.facebook.com/groups/Rain4SA/> (Admin) @DVDwizz <https://twitter.com/DVDwizz> [Ntaba Mhlophe] |
|
From: Marcelo S. <mar...@ya...> - 2012-12-25 14:49:11
|
Em 25 de dezembro de 2012, 03:41h, "Christopher M. Vanderwall-Brown" <chr...@gm...> escreveu: Hi Christopher, > Question: > > I'm getting the following errors when I attempt the chain: gpg > --recv-keys 90127f5b && gpg --export --armor 90127f5b|sudo apt-key add - > > as per your page's instructions at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian/ > > gpg: no keyserver known (use option --keyserver) > gpg: keyserver receive failed: bad URI > > What is the keyserver or what instruction code am I missing? I've > already updated apt-key-add to the latest version. As you can see in error message, you don't have configured a gpg server. Try to type something like this: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 90127f5b && gpg --export \ --armor 90127f5b|sudo apt-key add - Cheers, -- Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778 http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467 |
|
From: Christopher M. Vanderwall-B. <chr...@gm...> - 2012-12-25 11:41:14
|
Question: I'm getting the following errors when I attempt the chain: gpg --recv-keys 90127f5b && gpg --export --armor 90127f5b|sudo apt-key add - as per your page's instructions at http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian/ gpg: no keyserver known (use option --keyserver) gpg: keyserver receive failed: bad URI What is the keyserver or what instruction code am I missing? I've already updated apt-key-add to the latest version. Thanks. Christopher |
|
From: Greg M. <gom...@gc...> - 2012-09-16 19:41:46
|
On Sunday 16 September 2012 7:54:38 am Marcelo Santana wrote: > gpg --recv-keys 90127F5B && gpg --export --armor 90127F5B|sudo > apt-key add - Thanks for the reply and for providing these packages. I was using a key server (mit.edu) that did not work. Switching to keys.gnupg.net works. -- Peace, Greg |
|
From: Marcelo S. <mar...@ya...> - 2012-09-16 16:09:03
|
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:00:52 -0800, Greg Madden <gom...@gc...> wrote: Hello Greg! > On Saturday 15 September 2012 6:07:00 pm Greg Madden wrote: > > I have only recieved one post from this list. This is a test and > > status report. Welcome aboard. :) > > I am using the apacheoo-deb repo at sourceforge.net on a Debian > > Wheezy box. Packages install correctly. The meta-packages, or lack > > of, took some study, but everthing installs fine. I agree with you and I intend do create meta-packages as soon as possible. But for while I am providing just packages exactly as provided by Apache Foundation. > > One concern I have is using third party repostitories. I usually do > > not use anything but Debian's official sites. Since Debian will not > > package AOO this is problematic. I think it's unlikely we have the AOO packages maintained officially by Debian project soon. Especially without a team really interested in keeping it so good shape as LibreOffice is maintained today. > esp. since the key '90127F5B' is not found using th e instructions on > the web site. Sorry, but what do you mean with "using th"? As you can see in README file you just need to do this, via terminal: $ gpg --recv-keys 90127F5B && gpg --export --armor 90127F5B|sudo apt-key add - Regards, -- Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: 208778 http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467 |
|
From: Greg M. <gom...@gc...> - 2012-09-16 05:07:38
|
On Saturday 15 September 2012 6:07:00 pm Greg Madden wrote: > I have only recieved one post from this list. This is a test and status > report. > > I am using the apacheoo-deb repo at sourceforge.net on a Debian Wheezy > box. Packages install correctly. The meta-packages, or lack of, took some > study, but everthing installs fine. > > One concern I have is using third party repostitories. I usually do not use > anything but Debian's official sites. Since Debian will not package AOO > this is problematic. > esp. since the key '90127F5B' is not found using th e instructions on the web site. -- Peace, Greg |
|
From: Greg M. <gom...@gc...> - 2012-09-16 02:13:49
|
I have only recieved one post from this list. This is a test and status report. I am using the apacheoo-deb repo at sourceforge.net on a Debian Wheezy box. Packages install correctly. The meta-packages, or lack of, took some study, but everthing installs fine. One concern I have is using third party repostitories. I usually do not use anything but Debian's official sites. Since Debian will not package AOO this is problematic. Peace, Greg |
|
From: Marcelo S. <mar...@ya...> - 2012-08-06 18:22:18
|
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:13:30 +0200, "red.iceman" <red...@gm...>
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi there,
> first of all: the apacheoo deb works fine so far (debian sid).
Thanks for your feedback.
> But the openoffice.org3-math package should depend on opensymbol.
All packages are the same provided by Apache Foundation.
What issue are you having without installing opensymbol fonts?
Regards,
--
Marcelo G. Santana(aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778
JID:mar...@ja... | GNU Privacy Guard ID: 89C55467
http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana
http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org
|
|
From: Marcelo S. <mar...@ya...> - 2012-05-30 13:47:52
|
Teste de criação da lista de discussão de usuários do repositório
Debian não oficial do Apache OpenOffice.
[]'s
--
Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778
JID:mar...@ja... | GNU Privacy Guard ID: 89C55467
http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana
http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org
|