Re: [Aoetools-discuss] end_request: I/O error
Brought to you by:
ecashin,
elcapitansam
From: Daofeng Li <li...@gm...> - 2015-06-17 05:08:01
|
Dear all, what does this kickme means? Thanks. # aoe-stat e50.0 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.10 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.1 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.11 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.12 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.13 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.14 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.15 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.16 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.17 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.18 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.19 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.20 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.2 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.21 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.22 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.23 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.3 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.4 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.5 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.6 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.7 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.8 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e50.9 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.0 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.10 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.1 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.11 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.12 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.13 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.14 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.15 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.16 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.17 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.18 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.19 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.20 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.2 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.21 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.22 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.23 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.3 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.4 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.5 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.6 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.7 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.8 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme e52.9 1000.204GB eth2 8704 up,kickme Daofeng On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Ed Cashin <ed....@ac...> wrote: > (I mean aoe-sancheck, with a hyphen.) > > > On 06/16/2015 08:39 PM, Ed Cashin wrote: > > Adi, do you think aoetools-36/aoesancheck is a good next step? > > On 06/16/2015 01:57 PM, Daofeng Li wrote: > > ok...I'm totally lost... :) > > $ ethtool -k em1 > Features for em1: > rx-checksumming: on > tx-checksumming: on > tx-checksum-ipv4: on > tx-checksum-ip-generic: off [fixed] > tx-checksum-ipv6: on > tx-checksum-fcoe-crc: on [fixed] > tx-checksum-sctp: on > scatter-gather: on > tx-scatter-gather: on > tx-scatter-gather-fraglist: off [fixed] > tcp-segmentation-offload: on > tx-tcp-segmentation: on > tx-tcp-ecn-segmentation: off [fixed] > tx-tcp6-segmentation: on > udp-fragmentation-offload: off [fixed] > generic-segmentation-offload: on > generic-receive-offload: on > large-receive-offload: on > rx-vlan-offload: on > tx-vlan-offload: on > ntuple-filters: off > receive-hashing: on > highdma: on [fixed] > rx-vlan-filter: on > vlan-challenged: off [fixed] > tx-lockless: off [fixed] > netns-local: off [fixed] > tx-gso-robust: off [fixed] > tx-fcoe-segmentation: on [fixed] > tx-gre-segmentation: off [fixed] > tx-ipip-segmentation: off [fixed] > tx-sit-segmentation: off [fixed] > tx-udp_tnl-segmentation: off [fixed] > tx-mpls-segmentation: off [fixed] > fcoe-mtu: off [fixed] > tx-nocache-copy: on > loopback: off [fixed] > rx-fcs: off [fixed] > rx-all: off > tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed] > rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed] > rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed] > l2-fwd-offload: off > > > Daofeng > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Daofeng Li <li...@gm...> wrote: > >> Thanks Adi, I'll try. >> >> best, >> >> >> Daofeng >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Adi Kriegisch <ad...@cg...> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey! >>> >>> > Honestly..I don't know what those dropped packets, it;s just a new >>> > installed system. >>> I see... depending on what services are running on that network, this >>> might >>> be some avahi messages or similar stuff; in case this is a storage-only >>> network and there is no other stuff floating around, this may well be the >>> cause for the issues... >>> >>> > Do you mean my MTU 9000 is too high? >>> No, I don't think so. Maybe some of the ethernet offloading stuff in the >>> NIC is unable to handle larger packets? You may check with 'ethtool -k >>> em1' >>> what is enabled and may try to selectively disable and retest... >>> >>> -- Adi >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Aoetools-discuss mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Aoetools-discuss mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Aoetools-discuss mailing list > Aoe...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss > > |