Useful: yes. We're currently using a FrameMaker/PDF workflow for document authoring and review (you can add Post-Its to PDF documents), but this would allow us to switch to (X)HTML+CSS.
Features: Archiving of all comments to some file to be checked into a CM system as a review record. I guess you could just save the source of the left-hand frame.
I thought the speed was fine (once it'll run under mod_perl). Unless you're talking about speed of a user adding notes (something like a time-and-motion study). Given validating (X)HTML, I think you could number the paragraphs with JavaScript/DOM and attach notes to a para no. Still want to keep the current scheme as an alternative for higher resolution though.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Is this a useful package? What features (besides a sorely-needed speed boost) woud make it more useful?
On the speed issue, any thoughts on how to make the note placement/matching more efficient?
--Wendy
Useful: yes. We're currently using a FrameMaker/PDF workflow for document authoring and review (you can add Post-Its to PDF documents), but this would allow us to switch to (X)HTML+CSS.
Features: Archiving of all comments to some file to be checked into a CM system as a review record. I guess you could just save the source of the left-hand frame.
I thought the speed was fine (once it'll run under mod_perl). Unless you're talking about speed of a user adding notes (something like a time-and-motion study). Given validating (X)HTML, I think you could number the paragraphs with JavaScript/DOM and attach notes to a para no. Still want to keep the current scheme as an alternative for higher resolution though.