|
From: David M. <d_m...@ac...> - 2005-01-27 20:00:17
|
I just ran across this release of the "XML-binary Optimized Packaging" as a W3C recommendation: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xop10-20050125. It strikes me that this has the potential to a) reduce the file size of AnIML files; and b) remove the need for encoding/decoding base64 strings, thereby improving performance of software processing AnIML files. I'm not proposing a switch to this specification at this point, but just wanted to ask my learned colleagues whether this spec might make sense at some point in the future? Regards, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Burkhard Schaefer [mailto:b_...@us...] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 9:51 PM To: AnIML Developer List Subject: [Animl-develop] Array Sizing for Base64 values Regarding Mark B.'s question about Base64 array lengths: I think most algorithms work the same way as the one you've written. You can infer the number of values by looking at the length of the base64 string. (if you know whether it contains float64 or float32 values) This way you can find out how much memory you need to allocate before actually decoding the base64 string. Best wishes, Burkhard ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Animl-develop mailing list Ani...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/animl-develop |