|
From: Burkhard S. <b_...@us...> - 2004-12-17 16:10:00
|
Hi everybody, > there is no logical reason why startOffset should be less than endOffset We have to remember that startOffset and endOffset are actually indices. That's why we renamed them in yesterday's phone conference to startIndex and endIndex. They indicate the index of the 1st and the last data point the associated *ValueSet should map to. So the start index actually has to be smaller than the end index. Building a ValueSet where the endIndex is smaller than the startIndex would be very confusing. What would it mean? Should the values be mapped in reverse order? So I believe that the startIndex <= endIndex constraint actually makes sense. Best wishes, Burkhard |