Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Animl-develop] Allowed Values in AnIML
|
From: <Mar...@cr...> - 2004-03-07 00:50:24
|
Dear Dr. Chalk, > Both MP and BP (shouldn't they be MeltingPoint and BoilingPoint) are = in > most cases ranges of numbers. The ability to store this is a matter of the technique definition, not = of the Core schema (to which Dominik was referring). As I am currently writing prototype technique definitions, I will gladl= y incorporate this. Thank you for reminding me! > As a general note I am stating to work on implementing animl in my la= b and > I have many other questions. Forgive my curiosity: What do you mean by "implementing"? > Would it be possible to set up CVS for animl development? This is generally possible on SourceForge, and used to work, but as far= as I know there has been some kind of problem. Some people started to try = and make it work again after this was requested at the last working meeting= . Maybe someone can update us on the current status. > When I say bugs I mean XSD issues that are either too limiting or are= not > well enough defined. Just a thought. FYI: I can help with both.... = ;) The animl-develop mailing list is exactly the place to discuss this. So= let's hear your bug reports! Best regards, Dr. Maren Fiege Product Manager -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------- CREON=B7LAB=B7CONTROL AG a subsidiary of Waters Corporation Europaallee 27-29, D-50226 Frechen, Germany Tel. +49 2234 9207 0 Fax. +49 2234 9207 99 http://www.creonlabcontrol.com For up-to-date information subscribe to our free newsletter at http://www.creonlabcontrol.com/news/news_archive.htm -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------- = =20 Stuart Chalk <sc...@un...> = =20 Sent by: To: Domini= k Poetz <dom...@ni...> =20 ani...@li... cc: AnIML = Mailing List =20 eforge.net <animl-annou= nc...@li...>, AnIML Mailing =20 List <animl-= de...@li...> =20 Subject: R= e: [Animl-develop] Allowed Values in AnIML =20 05.03.2004 10:47 = =20 = =20 = =20 The same is true in the parameter data for a SampleSet Both MP and BP (shouldn't they be MeltingPoint and BoilingPoint) are in= most cases ranges of numbers. As a general note I am stating to work on implementing animl in my lab = and I have many other questions. Would it be possible to set up CVS for an= iml development? Then people can report bugs and have those bugs worked on= . When I say bugs I mean XSD issues that are either too limiting or are n= ot well enough defined. Just a thought. FYI: I can help with both.... ;)= Stuart Chalk, Ph.D. **NEW** Phone:904-620-1= 938 Associate Professor of Chemistry Fax:904-620-3= 885 Department of Chemistry and Physics "The Flow Analysis Databa= se" University of North Florida http://www.fia.unf.e= du/ 4567 St. Johns Bluff Road S. "The Analytical Sciences Digital Libra= ry" Jacksonville FL 32224 USA http://www.asdlib.o= rg/ On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Dominik Poetz wrote: > Hi everybody, > > > I hope everyone is doing well. > > At the last AnIML Working Group meeting, we discussed wanting to allo= w > multiple, single "allowed values" for parameter values in the techniq= ue layer. > > Instead of multiple, single "AllowedValue" values, we might do better= to allow > ranges of "AllowedValue" values. For example, with temperature it wo= uld be > better to allow this "AllowedValue" to range between a minimum value = and a > maximum value. To specify a single value we would have to put the va= lue in > both, Min and Max fields or maybe the Max field would be empty. But t= his is a > design detail that is not so important at this point. > The usage of that could be for vendors to specify their devises in th= eir vendor > extensions if they want. > > On another subtopic, shouldn't we add a flag (attribute) to "AllowedValue" to > reverse it's sense and let us list non-allowed values? > This wouldn't cost us much, and it gives us more flexibility in desig= ning > techniques. To promote better understanding, we might choose to renam= e the > "AllowedValue" to maybe "RestrictedRange" or "QualifiedRange." > > In addition, do we need a similar notation for vectors? > > It would be nice to get some more ideas about this. > > Hope to hear from you, > > Dominik > > ------------------------------------------------ > Dominik Poetz > U.S. Department of Commerce > National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive > 227/A157, MS 8394 > Gaithersburg, MD 20899 > Phone: 301-975-4645 > Fax: 301-977-0587 > Email: dom...@ni... > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of= > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3D= click > _______________________________________________ > Animl-develop mailing list > Ani...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/animl-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3Dc= lick _______________________________________________ Animl-develop mailing list Ani...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/animl-develop = |
