|
From: <Mar...@cr...> - 2004-03-07 00:39:35
|
Hi Dominik, > Instead of multiple, single "AllowedValue" values, we might do better= to allow > ranges of "AllowedValue" values. For example, with temperature it wo= uld be > better to allow this "AllowedValue" to range between a minimum value = and a > maximum value. This sounds like a good idea to me. However, we have to keep the possibility to specify multiple single values in case we have a string value we want to restrict. > On another subtopic, shouldn't we add a flag (attribute) to "AllowedValue" to > reverse it's sense and let us list non-allowed values? > This wouldn't cost us much, and it gives us more flexibility in desig= ning > techniques. To promote better understanding, we might choose to renam= e the > "AllowedValue" to maybe "RestrictedRange" or "QualifiedRange." > In addition, do we need a similar notation for vectors? This would be OK for Parameters. We shouldn't restrict the measured dat= a, however, unless we want to lose 21VFR11 compliance. Best regards, Dr. Maren Fiege Product Manager -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------- CREON=B7LAB=B7CONTROL AG a subsidiary of Waters Corporation Europaallee 27-29, D-50226 Frechen, Germany Tel. +49 2234 9207 0 Fax. +49 2234 9207 99 http://www.creonlabcontrol.com For up-to-date information subscribe to our free newsletter at http://www.creonlabcontrol.com/news/news_archive.htm -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------= |