[Animl-develop] [animl - Open Discussion] Proposed AnIML schemas

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Read and respond to this message at: 
https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2204134
By: jhduck

First I apologize for my absence at the last few meetings; with that in mind
my comments below are possibly out of context from what was actually proposed.


I just had a chance to review the proposed schemas from Waters\Creon-LabControl
and one thing struck me - there is significant separate of the relevant information
on the analysis performed (i.e. the scan record in the MS element of the Technique
schema) and the measured data (i.e. the SVector or TVector in the Core schema).


I cannot see how these bits of information which are fundamentally related will
be tied together in the layered schema approach proposed.  In thinking about
it a bit, shouldn't the "lower level" schemas (i.e. Core, Sample) expose their
element definitions as XSD ComplexTypes that can be use to define subelement
types in the higher order schemas?  Otherwise, the data links between relevant
portions of the data set will be obscured by the XML hierarchy at best; at worst
the links might be completely impossible to make.


Again, I may be missing something since I was not able to attend the meetings
where this work was presented.


- - James Duckworth, Thermo Electron Corp.

______________________________________________________________________
You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum.
To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: 
https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=262127