[Amforth] .S “dot-s”

[Enoch <ix...@ho...>]

Hello Matthias & all,

Regarding .S

Indeed, says Forth 2012 RC1, "the format of the display is
implementation-dependent".

However, doesn't GFORTH display order make a better sense:

1 2 3 .s <3> 1 2 3  ok

While ours:

> 1 2 3 .s
3 2 1  ok

Thanks, Enoch.