Re: [Amforth] int_restore, etc.

[Enoch <ix...@ho...>]

Enoch <ix...@ho...> writes:

> Hello Matthias and all,
>
> "-int" (int-off.asm) counterpart is "int_restore" (int-restore.asm). So,
> why is this "int_restore" header commented out, i.e., not available to
> the high level?
>
> Candidly, as "+int" (int-on.asm) is a simple SEI instruction (Set Global
> Interrupt Flag) one would expect "-int" to be a simple CLI (Clear Global
> Interrupt Flag) but this is not the case...
>
> May I suggest:
>
> +int → SEI
> -int → CLI
> int_suspend → ( -- SREG ) CLI
> int_restore → ( SREG -- )
>
> Thanks, Enoch.
>

Here's my svn diff vis-a-vis r1366 for your consideration:

http://pastebin.com/0dhM599q

Thanks, Enoch.

>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, 
> is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought 
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, 
> whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most 
> recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
> Amf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel