From: Matthias T. <mt...@we...> - 2007-05-20 16:15:55
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hans, Hans H=FCbner schrieb: > while checking out the repository, I found that you decided to move=20 > appl and lib out of the trunk path. Is that really what you > intended? Yes. The reason is that I do not really want the applications be seen as part of amforth. They may be a source of inspiration. > That way, it would be easier to check out the full tree and also it > would be easier to snapshot the lib and appl directories when a > release is made. I do not intent to make the applications a part of the amforth releases. The amforth release should be as clean as possible, the applications may have different release cycles (if any). So they may reference specific amforth release. > Also, such a revised layout would be more in line what SVN=20 > repositories generally look like, so it would be less suprising to > use for people with SVN experience. And I have seen a lot of svn repositories without the propagated trunk/releases/branches structure which work really well. The current structure is simply my _current_ best idea how the organise the project. But your feedback is very welcome! Bye Matthias -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGUHRV9bEHdGEMFjMRAk2sAKCOP7SPysQZn9o8zWixKxZUOmu0lQCfcBvN MaP0bLdEFYoxkc3PXv9ViX8=3D =3Dtkn+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |