From: Matthias T. <mt...@we...> - 2007-03-09 08:01:34
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Pix, > would it be to ugly to have the script implement "INCLUDE" and > "INCLUDE?" on it's side? I see no other place to implement it. If amforth sees these instructions it will abort. >> If amforth signals an abort instead of the ok the script should stop >> uploading. > > do you mean, any of the error messages starting with "??" ? Yes. >> Limit the number of characters sent per second to some adjustable value > > hmmm. doable i guess. > > i was wondering, would there be any value in sending a few more > characters than have been echoed back? is there any kind of buffer? there are two buffers: usart receive buffer (16 characters long) and the forth TIB (80 characters). Only the characters in the TIB had echos back to the serial line (except some control characters). The usart buffer keeps the "unread" characters that wait for the next execution of key. I'm not fully satisfied with it but it works "good enough", at least for me.... > i was thinking the script at the moment might be too cautious. That's impossible ;=) Bye Matthias -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF8RRULo3irIddFw4RAhGlAJwMSYRYj410g+2M/zfsLqC6HI93eQCgyc9c 6Tg4X0S92vVOpRa7r2sESSg= =comk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |