Re: [Amforth] Vocabulary

[Jan K. <kro...@ho...>]

Hi Erich This is the answer that I get from amForth    amforth 4.8 ATmega328P
>
 ok
>
 ok
> forth
forth ?? -13 5
> FORTH
FORTH ?? -13 5
>
Sommeting wrong with the definition of vacabulary or the other words?
 Cheers, Jan> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:31:24 +0200
> From: ew....@na...
> To: amf...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Amforth] Vocabulary
> 
> Hi Jan,
> 
> On 05/31/2012 12:14 PM, Jan Kromhout wrote:
> >
> > Hello, I tested the word vocabulary with vocabulary test-vocabulary
> > only forth also test-vocabulary definitions: test1 ." test1" ;
> > : test2 ." test2" ;
> > : test3 ." test3" ;
> > : test4 ." test4" ;
> > : test5 ." test5" ;previous definitions On one thing all is working fine. When I wont
> > to go back to the Forth vocabulary, in my win32 forth I type in FORTH.When I try that
> > in amForth there is no posibilty to go back.System is not recognise anny words except
> > the ones in the vocabulary. What should I do? Thanks for anny help.
>  >
> 
> "FORTH" or "forth" ?
> 
> Please note, that amforth is case-sensitive. Looking at
>   http://amforth.sourceforge.net/words/index.html
> the word "forth" (lower case) is available.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Erich
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
> Amf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel