Re: [Amforth-devel] >FLOAT

[Matthias T. <mt...@we...>]

hi,

> Hi Pito.
> 
> If >float is assembler defined and closed with something like end- 
> code, this end-code has to smudge the definition the same way ;  
> (semicolon) does it.

>float is forth code. (http://github.com/lnmaurer/amforth-float )

> It has been a long standing claim that a definition may not be found  
> until it is finished. So setting the "smudgebit" is last thing to do.  
> amforth4.2 has this behavior now. Maybe you found a side effect of  
> this new behaviour. But there shoud be some kind of "smudge" word to  
> solve this problem then.

what should that smudge do? if you want to use the word currently
beeing defined, use recurse, after the ; the new name will be visible
anyway. btw: there is no smudge bit in amforth.


Matthias