From: Matthias T. <mt...@we...> - 2010-09-30 18:37:38
|
hi, > Hi Pito. > > If >float is assembler defined and closed with something like end- > code, this end-code has to smudge the definition the same way ; > (semicolon) does it. >float is forth code. (http://github.com/lnmaurer/amforth-float ) > It has been a long standing claim that a definition may not be found > until it is finished. So setting the "smudgebit" is last thing to do. > amforth4.2 has this behavior now. Maybe you found a side effect of > this new behaviour. But there shoud be some kind of "smudge" word to > solve this problem then. what should that smudge do? if you want to use the word currently beeing defined, use recurse, after the ; the new name will be visible anyway. btw: there is no smudge bit in amforth. Matthias |